midpage
276 P.3d 929
Mont.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Green assaulted his wife during a dispute over divorce and access to their children, resulting in strangulation and attempted suffocation; a loaded gun was involved during the incident.
  • Green pled guilty to felony aggravated assault; other related charges were dismissed as part of a plea.
  • The district court imposed twenty years with fifteen suspended, conditioned on abstaining from alcohol and drugs, avoiding alcohol-centric establishments, breath and bodily fluid testing, and obtaining a chemical dependency evaluation.
  • Green objected, arguing no history of alcohol use or abuse and no alcohol involvement in the offense; he has Major Depressive Disorder and a history of violence toward women.
  • District Court overruled the objection, finding alcohol abstinence necessary for rehabilitation given Green’s violent history; Green appeals on the alcohol-related conditions.
  • The court’s decision is contested on the nexus between the alcohol restrictions and Green’s offense or offender, with a direct appeal of sentencing conditions only.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether alcohol-related sentencing conditions have a valid nexus to the offense or offender Green: no nexus; no alcohol history connected to offense State: nexus exists due to violence history and mental health factors Yes; sufficient nexus to support alcohol conditions

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Ashby, 2008 MT 83 (2008 MT 83) (nexus required; no history of alcohol use supported restriction)
  • State v. Stiles, 2008 MT 390 (2008 MT 390) (alcohol restriction lacked nexus; not recent or significant)
  • State v. Heddings, 2008 MT 402 (2008 MT 402) (psychological recommendations can establish nexus for alcohol restrictions)
  • State v. Guill, 2011 MT 32 (2011 MT 32) (statutory authority and nexus considerations for probation conditions)
  • State v. Zimmerman, 2010 MT 44 (2010 MT 44) (nexus requirement for probation conditions; limits on overly broad restrictions)
  • State v. Hunter, 2008 MT 395 (2008 MT 395) (restrictions may be imposed to reduce recidivism when nexus exists)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Green
Court Name: Montana Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 19, 2012
Citations: 276 P.3d 929; 2012 MT 87; 364 Mont. 515; 2012 Mont. LEXIS 92; 2012 WL 1356335; DA 11-0586
Docket Number: DA 11-0586
Court Abbreviation: Mont.
Log In