History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Gray
261 Or. App. 121
Or. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant challenged the trial court’s instruction on forcible compulsion for rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree after a jury trial.
  • The trial court instructed four elements for each offense but did not require a culpable mental state for the forcible compulsion element.
  • The jury acquitted several counts while convicting Counts 1 (rape) and 2 (sexual abuse) and Count 3 (sexual abuse in the second degree) based on nonconsensual conduct.
  • The court merged Count 3 into Count 1 and imposed minimum terms on Counts 1 and 2.
  • Defendant argued plain error under Nelson and requested correction, though he did not preserve the exact instruction issue at trial.
  • The court concluded the error was plain and exercised its discretion to correct, reversing and remanding Counts 1 and 2 for resentencing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether failure to instruct culpable mental state for forcible compulsion was plain error Nelson required culpable state for forcible compulsion. Failure to give the instruction was plain error under Nelson/Vanornum. Yes; the error was plain.
Whether the court should exercise discretion to correct the plain error Serious felonies and potential prejudice warrant correction. No correction if harmless; mitigating factors exist. Yes; court exercised discretion to correct the error.
Impact of the instructional error on Counts 1 and 2 and remand extent Counts 1 and 2 were affected; requires remand for resentencing. Error may be harmless as to some convictions. Reversed and remanded on Counts 1 and 2; remanded for resentencing.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Brown, 310 Or 347 (1990) (plain-error standard for instructional error)
  • Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or 376 (1991) (discretion to correct plain-error)
  • State v. Vanornum, 354 Or 614 (2013) (plain-error review of instructional error; overruling preservation rule)
  • State v. Nelson, 241 Or App 681 (2011) (culpable mental state required for forcible compulsion)
  • State v. Jury, 185 Or App 132 (2002) (plain-error analysis framework referenced by Brown/Ailes)
  • State v. Oliphant, 347 Or 175 (2009) (correct handling of self-defense and reasonableness; related instructional error context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Gray
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Feb 20, 2014
Citation: 261 Or. App. 121
Docket Number: CR110048DV; A149013
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.