midpage
2012 Ohio 902
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Gordon was indicted in 1998 for aggravated murder with a firearm specification; he pleaded guilty to an amended murder charge and was sentenced to 15-to-life plus a 3-year firearm term on December 22, 1998.
  • Gordon moved to withdraw his guilty plea on June 4, 1999; the trial court denied the motion on July 14, 1999.
  • Gordon attempted an appeal of that denial, but it was dismissed as untimely in 1999; delayed appeal was denied in 2000.
  • In 2010, Gordon filed a “Motion for New Sentencing” arguing a void sentence due to post-release control; the court denied, and the appellate court affirmed in 2010.
  • In 2011, Gordon filed a second motion to withdraw his plea and motions to dismiss the indictment and for grand jury transcript inspection; the trial court denied, and Gordon appealed.
  • The Court of Appeals ultimately affirmed the trial court’s denials, holding that the three motions were properly resolved without reversible error.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the post-sentence Crim.R. 32.1 motion to withdraw plea was properly denied Gordon argues plea not knowing/informed; ineffective assistance; coercion; exculpatory evidence withholding State contends res judicata and untimeliness bar relief; record shows no manifest injustice Denied; motions overruled
Whether a hearing was required before ruling on the Crim.R. 32.1 motion Gordon asserts need for an evidentiary hearing to establish factual support State contends no hearing warranted as record contradicted allegations No hearing required; record supported denial
Whether the indictment should have been dismissed for facial invalidity or lack of jurisdiction Gordon contends indictment signed after plea and jurisdiction contested Indictment signed and filed; defect not shown; res judicata applies Indictment valid; no basis to dismiss; jurisdiction proper

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Brown, 9th Dist. No. 24831, 2010-Ohio-2328 (Ohio 2010) (manifest injustice standard; Crim.R. 32.1 standard)
  • State v. Perry, 10 Ohio St.2d 175 (1967) (Supreme Court (1967)) (doctrine of res judicata applicability)
  • State v. Gorospe, 9th Dist. Nos. 25551, 25552, 2011-Ohio-3291 (Ohio 2011) (Crim.R. 32.1; post-sentence withdrawal proceedings)
  • State v. Rexroad, 9th Dist. No. 22214, 2004-Ohio-6271 (Ohio 2004) (precludes relief when issues could have been raised on direct appeal)
  • State v. Banks, 9th Dist. No. 01CA007958, 2002-Ohio-4858 (Ohio 2002) (no hearing where record contradicts withdrawal allegations)
  • State v. Buck, 9th Dist. No. 04CA008516, 2005-Ohio-2810 (Ohio 2005) (no manifest injustice; no evidentiary hearing required)
  • State v. Cooey, 46 Ohio St.3d 20, 1989 (Ohio 1989) (journal records import verity absent contrary evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Gordon
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 7, 2012
Citations: 2012 Ohio 902; 25911
Docket Number: 25911
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In