midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2013 Ohio 2119
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Goode pled guilty to one count of having a weapon while under disability; the state dismissed the other count.
  • The trial court sentenced Goode to community control sanctions for up to five years.
  • Goode had filed a motion to suppress; the matter proceeded to plea negotiations before resolution.
  • An Anders brief was filed by appointed counsel; Goode did not file a pro se brief after notice.
  • The court conducted a thorough Crim. R. 11 Colloquy, finding the plea knowing and voluntary.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the plea involuntary? Plea was knowing and voluntary per Crim.R.11. Goode was surprised and reluctant at first about the plea. Plea was voluntary.
Was the indictment properly amended during the plea hearing? Crim.R. 7 permits amendment of defects; deletion did not alter the crime. Amendment could have affected charges or identity of the offense. Amendment valid; no change in crime identity.

Key Cases Cited

  • Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967) (appointed counsel duty to file meritorious issues on appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Goode
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 24, 2013
Citations: 2013 Ohio 2119; 25340
Docket Number: 25340
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In