State v. Goff
308 Ga. 330
Ga.2020Background
- On July 7, 2012, Tiffany Salter was found strangled near a shallow, freshly disturbed area behind the home she shared with Todd Goff; a shovel and a jug with both their DNA were nearby. The medical examiner ruled death by asphyxiation by strangulation.
- Goff was indicted, tried in March–April 2014, convicted of malice murder (life without parole) and felony murder (vacated by operation of law), and later moved for a new trial alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
- At trial Goff did not testify; key evidence included his mother Joanne Ciccio’s recorded statement (played to the jury) in which she related Goff’s statements that he choked Salter and was on probation; Ciccio’s in-court testimony was less definitive.
- At the motion-for-new-trial hearing Goff testified he expected to testify but that counsel urged him not to, and Goff proffered a booking photo showing a neck scratch; Goff also described the encounter as mutual fighting and claimed provocation and suicidal ideation prior to the incident.
- The trial court granted a new trial on three special grounds of ineffective assistance: (1) counsel advised Goff not to testify; (2) counsel failed to move for mistrial after the probation reference was heard by the jury; and (3) counsel failed to introduce Goff’s booking photos. The State appealed.
- The Supreme Court of Georgia reversed, holding the trial court erred because counsel’s conduct was not constitutionally deficient on any of those three grounds.
Issues
| Issue | State's Argument | Goff's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether counsel was ineffective for advising Goff not to testify | Counsel’s advice deprived Goff of testimony necessary to show provocation and would have supported voluntary manslaughter | Counsel’s choice was strategic; he properly warned of damaging cross-examination and Goff’s unpredictability | Court: No deficient performance — decision was a reasonable tactical choice; not patently unreasonable to advise against testifying |
| Whether counsel was ineffective for not moving for a mistrial after jury heard Goff was on probation | Failure to seek mistrial over the probation reference warranted relief | Counsel reasonably declined mistrial because the reference was fleeting and nonspecific and trial was going well | Court: No deficient performance — fleeting, nonspecific probation mention did not require mistrial; counsel’s choice reasonable |
| Whether counsel was ineffective for failing to introduce Goff’s booking photos | Photos would corroborate scratches and support provocation defense | Introduction would have required Goff’s testimony to explain significance, risking impeachment; counsel reasonably declined to force that choice | Court: No deficient performance — photos needed Goff’s testimony to be effective, and Goff’s decision not to testify was not shown to be the product of deficient counsel |
Key Cases Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (establishes two-prong ineffective assistance test)
- Crouch v. State, 305 Ga. 391 (strategic choices after investigation are virtually unchallengeable)
- Hamilton v. State, 274 Ga. 582 (decision to advise defendant not to testify is a strategic choice)
- Gibson v. State, 290 Ga. 6 (decision whether to testify is defendant’s tactical choice after counsel consultation)
- Barnett v. State, 300 Ga. 551 (counsel’s advice not to testify not deficient where tactic avoided damaging cross-examination)
- Brown v. State, 307 Ga. 24 (brief, non-responsive references do not automatically render counsel ineffective for failing to object)
- Babbage v. State, 296 Ga. 364 (brief reference to prior incarceration did not warrant deficient-performance finding)
- Smith v. State, 296 Ga. 731 (presumption that counsel’s conduct falls within reasonable professional norms)
- O'Neal v. State, 285 Ga. 361 (appellate review standard for trial court grants of new trial on legal grounds)
