History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Gibson
2016 Ohio 7629
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • On Sept. 21, 2015, homeowner Junior Neal observed a white pickup leaving his driveway and identified Travis Gibson as the driver; Neal later discovered items missing from his garage.
  • Neal told police Gibson had been to his house before; some stolen items were later recovered and reported purchased by Delbert Harless from Gibson.
  • Gibson was arrested; he claimed an arrangement with Neal to take items to sell, which Neal denied.
  • Gibson was indicted on one count of breaking and entering (felony 5th) and one count of theft (1st-degree misdemeanor); a jury convicted him and the court sentenced him to 12 months.
  • At trial, after direct and cross-examination of Neal, the prosecution conducted redirect; defense requested recross but the trial court denied it.
  • On appeal Gibson argued the denial of recross violated his Sixth Amendment confrontation right; the appellate court reviewed for abuse of discretion and, because no contemporaneous objection was made, for plain error.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether denial of defense recross after prosecution redirect violated the Sixth Amendment confrontation right State: Redirect did not raise new matters beyond cross; trial court properly exercised discretion to deny recross Gibson: Prosecutor elicited new material on redirect (prior break-in, insurance report, prior dealings), so recross was required to test new evidence Court: No abuse of discretion and no plain error; redirect did not present new matters and, even if it did, any error did not affect substantial rights; conviction affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Faulkner v. State, 56 Ohio St.2d 42 (Ohio 1978) (recross required only when prosecution raises new matters on redirect; extent of recross is within trial court discretion)
  • Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308 (U.S. 1974) (cross-examination is essential to testing witness reliability)
  • Barnes v. State, 94 Ohio St.3d 21 (Ohio 2002) (plain-error standard elements for criminal cases)
  • United States v. Morris, 485 F.2d 1385 (5th Cir. 1973) (discipline of redirect: ideally no new material; recross permitted if new matters arise)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Gibson
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 31, 2016
Citation: 2016 Ohio 7629
Docket Number: 16CA7
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.