State v. Gianquitti
2011 R.I. LEXIS 81
| R.I. | 2011Background
- Gianquitti was convicted in Providence County Superior Court of second-degree murder and using a firearm during a crime of violence.
- The murder conviction carried forty years with twenty to serve, plus a mandatory life sentence consecutive to the firearm conviction.
- The events occurred when Pagano family members confronted Gianquitti at his home after an earlier exchange; during the confrontation Gianquitti shot James Pagano, who later died.
- Gianquitti testified a different version of events, claiming James lunged at him and he acted in self-defense after fearing for his life.
- At trial, Gianquitti sought a jury instruction under § 11-8-8 (rebuttable presumption of reasonable self-defense) based on alleged unlawful breaking and entering, which the trial justice denied.
- Gianquitti also sought to admit expert testimony from Dr. Lewinski on deadly force timing, but the court excluded it on a preliminary basis prior to trial, and the issue was not renewed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether § 11-8-8 instruction was properly denied | Gianquitti; §11-8-8 should apply given breaking and entering evidence. | State; no break occurred through open door; no presumption applies. | No error; court declined instruction. |
| Whether exclusion of Dr. Lewinski’s testimony was proper | Gianquitti; expert testimony supports self-defense theory. | State; ruling was preliminary and not renewed; issue waived. | Issue waived; trial court's exclusion affirmed. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Fuller-Balletta, 996 A.2d 133 (R.I.2010) (mixed question of law and fact; deference to trial court on factual findings)
- State v. Simpson, 611 A.2d 1390 (R.I.1992) (break under § 11-8-2 involves removal of an obstruction)
- State v. Stone, 924 A.2d 773 (R.I.2007) (admissibility of expert testimony within trial court's discretion)
- Laverty v. Pearlman, 654 A.2d 696 (R.I.1995) (abuse of discretion standard for expert testimony)
- Mosby v. Devine, 851 A.2d 1031 (R.I.2004) (Castle Doctrine recognized as exception to retreat duty)
- Cerilli v. Newport Offshore, Ltd., 612 A.2d 35 (R.I.1992) (standard for reviewing trial court evidentiary rulings)
