State v. Gaffin
2017 Ohio 2935
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2017Background
- Kevin Gaffin was indicted on seven counts (three counts of rape, three counts of sexual battery, one count of felonious assault) for sexual assaults on his stepson, R.A.; he pleaded not guilty and was tried in June 2016.
- Trial testimony described two incidents of sexual assault when the victim was about six to seven years old and subsequent disclosure years later leading to evaluation and counseling diagnoses.
- During jury deliberations (about an hour in), defense counsel learned a juror told a deputy he had “made up his mind”; the court questioned that juror, who stated he was still considering the evidence and had not discussed it with other jurors.
- The prosecutor requested the juror be excused; the trial court excused him, sequestered him from the panel, replaced him with an alternate, and instructed the jury to restart deliberations from the beginning.
- The jury returned guilty verdicts on all counts about forty minutes after restarting; Gaffin was sentenced to life without parole and appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court erred by not questioning remaining jurors after juror misconduct was discovered | State: Court’s handling (questioning the juror, excusing him, replacing with alternate, restarting deliberations) was proper | Gaffin: Court should have voir dired remaining jurors to determine if they were tainted | Court: Gaffin waived all but plain error; no plain error — court reasonably handled the incident and had no reason to believe other jurors were affected |
| Whether Gaffin received ineffective assistance of counsel based on multiple alleged deficiencies | State: Counsel’s performance presumed reasonable; Gaffin failed to show prejudice from alleged errors | Gaffin: Cumulative errors (failure to object, expert work, openings, evidentiary strategy, etc.) deprived him of effective assistance | Court: Strickland requires prejudice; Gaffin did not demonstrate how outcomes would differ, so claim fails (no need to reach deficiency prong) |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Hessler, 90 Ohio St.3d 108 (trial judge entitled to deference in juror-misconduct inquiries)
- State v. Huertas, 51 Ohio St.3d 22 (deference to trial judge on juror matters)
- State v. Adams, 62 Ohio St.2d 151 (standard for reversing juror-misconduct handling)
- State v. Sanders, 92 Ohio St.3d 245 (failure to request relief at trial waives juror-misconduct claim absent plain error)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (two-prong deficient performance and prejudice standard for ineffective assistance)
- McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759 (right to counsel includes effective assistance)
- State v. Issa, 93 Ohio St.3d 49 (Ohio application of Strickland)
- State v. Goff, 82 Ohio St.3d 123 (further discussion of ineffective-assistance principles)
- State v. Barnes, 94 Ohio St.3d 21 (plain-error framework)
- State v. Davis, 116 Ohio St.3d 404 (burden on party asserting plain error)
