History
  • No items yet
midpage
14 N.W.3d 614
S.D.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Matthew Fuller pled guilty to felony marijuana possession and received a suspended two-year prison sentence, placed on probation.
  • Fuller was involved in multiple post-sentencing incidents, including two arrests related to drug and other crimes, leading to a State petition to revoke his probation.
  • During the probation revocation process, two court-appointed attorneys withdrew due to breakdowns in the attorney-client relationship; the court refused to appoint further counsel and proceeded with the hearing with Fuller self-represented.
  • The circuit court found Fuller violated probation, notably by using methamphetamine, and executed the two-year suspended sentence without granting him credit for 170 days spent in pre-hearing detention.
  • Fuller appealed, arguing the court erred by denying counsel, refusing jail time credit, judicial bias, and due process violations in the revocation process.

Issues

Issue Fuller’s Argument State’s Argument Held
Right to counsel at revocation hearing Denial of counsel violated statutory & constitutional rights Missed right, but lacked prejudice Statutory right violated, but Fuller suffered no harm
Credit for time served pre-hearing Court should have credited 170 days in jail No right to credit when held without bond No legal error, credit only due if held for inability to post bond
Judicial bias/recusal Court’s conduct showed partiality and should have recused Rulings were proper, no evidence of bias No evidence of actual or apparent bias
Due process in revocation Notice insufficient; petition vague about evidence Proper notice and discovery provided Petition sufficient; process met due process standards

Key Cases Cited

  • Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (conditional liberty at issue in revocation; due process requirements)
  • Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 (no per se right to counsel at revocation; case-by-case analysis)
  • Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606 (informal nature of revocation hearings)
  • Lassiter v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. of Durham Cnty., N.C., 452 U.S. 18 (right to counsel not automatic in all cases)
  • State v. Sorenson, 617 N.W.2d 146 (no jail credit owed when held without bond)
  • State v. Christian, 588 N.W.2d 881 (due process requirements for probation revocation hearings)
  • Marko v. Marko, 816 N.W.2d 820 (recusal/appearance of impartiality standard)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Fuller
Court Name: South Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 26, 2024
Citations: 14 N.W.3d 614; 2024 S.D. 72; 30391
Docket Number: 30391
Court Abbreviation: S.D.
Log In