History
  • No items yet
midpage
2013 Ohio 5865
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Fry was cited in 2000 for Driving Under FRA Suspension (R.C. 4507.02(B)(1)) and Fictitious Plates (R.C. 4549.08); a warrant issued after he failed to appear for arraignment.
  • In 2002 Fry appeared pro se, waived speedy trial, pleaded not guilty, but did not resolve the case; bond posted and another failure to appear occurred.
  • On August 14, 2012 Fry appeared, waived counsel, and pleaded guilty to both FRA suspension and Fictitious Plates after a long absence.
  • The trial court sentenced Fry to penalties under FRA suspension (jail time with portions suspended) and under Fictitious Plates; Fry subsequently moved to withdraw his plea and stayed sentencing.
  • The trial court denied the Crim.R. 32.1 motion without a hearing, and Fry sought appellate relief; the court ultimately held the plea was not entered knowingly and intelligently due to reliance on an incorrect FRA statute and remanded for further proceedings.
  • The court notes the FRA statute history, including its renumbering from R.C. 4507.02 to R.C. 4510.16 and the 2004 effective date changes.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Fry’s plea was knowingly entered given an incorrect FRA statute cited Fry argues plea was based on incorrect law. Fry contends the court misinformed him about penalties. Merit to withdraw plea; plea not knowingly entered.
Whether the trial court erred by denying Crim.R. 32.1 relief without a hearing Fry asserts manifest injustice due to uncounseled plea and improper penalties. Trial court acted within discretion; no automatic hearing required. Reversed; remand for a hearing and withdrawal of plea appropriate.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Engle, 74 Ohio St.3d 525 (1996) (erroneous understanding of law vitiates knowing and intelligent plea)
  • State v. Taylor, 3d Dist. No. 13-12-25, 2012-Ohio-5130 (2012) (amendment timing may require lesser sentence under 1.58(B))
  • State v. Smith, 49 Ohio St.2d 261, 361 N.E.2d 1324 (1977) (syllabus on withdrawal of guilty plea post-sentencing for manifest injustice)
  • State v. Bush, 3d Dist. No. 14-2000-44, 2002-Ohio-6146 (2002) (knowing and intelligent entry of plea; manifest injustice)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Fry
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 20, 2013
Citations: 2013 Ohio 5865; 12 MA 156
Docket Number: 12 MA 156
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In