History
  • No items yet
midpage
243 P.3d 873
Or. Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Anthony Fish was charged and tried for second-degree assault, two counts of fourth-degree assault, and menacing arising from a July 14, 2007 tavern parking lot brawl outside a tavern.
  • Cummings, the victim, testified about the stabbing-like wounds inflicted by Fish during the fight; defendant claimed self-defense and disputed who initiated the altercation.
  • During cross-examination, the prosecutor elicited Fish's prior statement to his mother that he planned to 'catch [Cummings] on fire' when released, which defense objected to as unfairly prejudicial.
  • The trial court admitted the statement as bias evidence under OEC 609-1, balancing it under OEC 403 despite minimal probative value and substantial prejudicial risk.
  • Fish was convicted after a jury trial; on appeal, he contested the admissibility of the statement and challenged a nonunanimous jury verdict instruction, which the court decided to reject without discussion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court properly admitted biased testimony about Fish State: evidence shows bias; admissible under OEC 609-1. Fish: evidence is unfairly prejudicial under OEC 403 and not sufficiently probative. Admission error under OEC 403; not harmless
Was the error harmless, given the evidence and theory of self-defense State: error harmless due to substantial guilt evidence and impeaching other witness credibility. Fish: error likely affected verdict and undermined self-defense theory. Error not harmless; reversal and remand
Did the court err in failing to discuss the nonunanimous verdict instruction State contends no error in instruction. Fish contends trial court erred with nonunanimous verdict ruling. Issue rejected without discussion

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Hubbard, 297 Or. 789, 688 P.2d 1311 (1984) (bias evidence admissibility and trial court discretion under OEC 403)
  • State v. Haugen, 349 Or. 174, 243 P.3d 31 (2010) (limits on admitting bias evidence; discretion to exclude)
  • State v. Berg, 223 Or. App. 387, 196 P.3d 547 (2008) (instruction limiting consideration when evidence admitted under 404(3))
  • State v. Davis, 336 Or. 19, 77 P.3d 1111 (2003) (harmless error standard in evidentiary rulings)
  • State v. Johnson, 342 Or. 596, 157 P.3d 198 (2007) (standard for reviewing convictions on appeal; light for bias evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Fish
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Nov 24, 2010
Citations: 243 P.3d 873; 239 Or. App. 1; 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1523; 07CR0486; A139664
Docket Number: 07CR0486; A139664
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Fish, 243 P.3d 873