History
  • No items yet
midpage
2015 Ohio 3878
Ohio Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Terry Dave Evans was convicted by a jury of attempted murder, two counts of felonious assault (merged into the attempted murder), kidnapping, tampering with evidence, disrupting public services, and possessing criminal tools.
  • At initial sentencing the trial court imposed consecutive terms: 11 years (attempted murder), 6 years (kidnapping), 2 years (tampering), 1 year (disrupting public services), and 1 year (possessing criminal tools), totaling 21 years.
  • On direct appeal this court held the trial court failed to make the statutory findings required for consecutive sentences and reversed and remanded for resentencing limited to that issue.
  • On remand the trial court held a resentencing hearing, incorporated earlier findings, added the required consecutive-sentence disproportionate finding, again imposed consecutive terms totaling 21 years, and explained the brutality of Evans’s conduct (choking, stabbing, pouring chlorine on the victim).
  • Evans appealed the resentencing, raising for the first time the argument that attempted murder and kidnapping were allied offenses that should have merged for sentencing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Evans can raise allied-offenses merger at resentencing State: the claim is barred by res judicata because it was not raised on direct appeal Evans: attempted murder and kidnapping are allied offenses and should have merged Court: Claim barred by res judicata; even on merits Evans forfeited all but plain error and made no plain-error showing, so assignment of error overruled

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Reynolds, 79 Ohio St.3d 158 (1997) (res judicata bars issues that could have been raised on direct appeal)
  • State v. Perry, 10 Ohio St.2d 175 (1967) (foundational Ohio rule on res judicata and postconviction relief)
  • State v. Comen, 50 Ohio St.3d 206 (1990) (failure to raise allied-offenses at sentencing forfeits all but plain error)
  • State v. Barnes, 94 Ohio St.3d 21 (2002) (plain-error standard requires obvious error affecting substantial rights)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Evans
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 24, 2015
Citations: 2015 Ohio 3878; 102215
Docket Number: 102215
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Evans, 2015 Ohio 3878