History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Eric K. Manning
132 A.3d 716
Vt.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • At 1:01 p.m. on August 12, 2013, a uniformed officer in a marked cruiser parked in a Hannaford lot known for drug activity; he ran a registration check and learned Manning’s license was suspended.
  • The officer approached Manning’s vehicle, observed Manning shuffle something toward the car’s console, and saw a prescription bottle partially hidden between the seats.
  • Manning handed the bottle to the officer after he asked for identification and license, while his wallet contained an excess amount of cash and his hands shook.
  • The officer opened the bottle later and found cocaine; about ten minutes elapsed from first approach to opening the bottle.
  • Manning was escorted to sit on the hood; the officer conducted further questioning and obtained more information before arresting him and collecting additional evidence.
  • Manning moved to suppress the evidence and pre-Miranda statements as unlawful seizures and custodial interrogation; the trial court denied the motion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Manning was lawfully seized and whether the stop could be expanded State: reasonable suspicion supports exit and questioning Manning: seizure exceeded the suspended-license investigation Yes; reasonable suspicion supported exit and continued questioning
Whether consent to search the bottle was tainted by an unlawful seizure State: consent valid because suspicion justified expansion Manning: unlawful seizure tainted consent Consent was voluntary; taint not shown
Whether Manning was subject to custodial interrogation requiring Miranda warnings State: interrogation outside a cruiser in public place did not constitute custody Manning: exit order and questioning amounted to custodial interrogation Not custodial; Miranda warnings not required

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Lussier, 171 Vt. 19 (2000) (reasonable suspicion for a stop based on traffic violations)
  • State v. Sprague, 2003 VT 20 (2003) (limits on detention duration and scope; exit orders during stops)
  • State v. Cunningham, 2008 VT 43 (2008) (nervousness and background facts weighed; not alone sufficient for suspicion)
  • State v. Dunham, 2013 VT 15 (2013) (totality-of-the-circumstances for reasonable suspicion)
  • State v. Paro, 2012 VT 53 (2012) (lack of reasonable suspicion where vehicle idling near recent burglaries)
  • State v. Sullivan, 2013 VT 71 (2013) (custody factors to determine Miranda applicability)
  • State v. Muntean, 2010 VT 88 (2010) (factors for custody determination; freedom to leave key factor)
  • State v. Sole, 2009 VT 24 (2009) (location and openness of interrogation matter for custody)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Eric K. Manning
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Oct 2, 2015
Citation: 132 A.3d 716
Docket Number: 2014-207
Court Abbreviation: Vt.