History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Emmons
2016 Ohio 5384
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • State appeals suppression ruling after a seven-minute traffic stop led to seizure of drugs found on Emmons and in the car.
  • Trooper Doebrich stopped Barrett for failing to stop at a marked stop line; Emmons claimed the car was hers and provided identification.
  • During the stop, the trooper questioned Barrett about the wound on his hands and about an open capias while Barrett’s identity was being verified.
  • Trooper Doebrich questioned Emmons about blood on her sleeve and potential drugs; Emmons admitted recent heroin use and consented to have her sleeves pulled up.
  • A needle was found in Emmons’s purse after she showed it; a bag of cocaine was later found in the car.
  • The trial court granted suppression, holding there was no reasonable suspicion and the stop was impermissibly prolonged; this court reverses and remands.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the seven-minute stop unreasonably prolonged? State: stop was lawful and questioning did not measurably extend detention. Emmons: questioning unrelated to the stop extended detention. No; stop not unreasonably prolonged.
Did the totality of circumstances establish reasonable suspicion to prolong the detention? State: totality showed ongoing drug activity. Emmons: no additional evidence of criminal activity. Yes; reasonable suspicion supported ongoing detention.

Key Cases Cited

  • Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (U.S. 1979) (stops and the need for license/registration checks in traffic stops)
  • Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (U.S. 1996) (detention during investigatory stops allowed if reasonable under Terry)
  • Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (U.S. 1977) (driver may be ordered from vehicle during stop)
  • Rodriguez v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 1609 (U.S. 2015) (questioning may extend stop only if not measurably prolonged)
  • Muehler v. Mena, 544 U.S. 93 (U.S. 2005) (police questioning lawful if it does not extend detention)
  • Bostick, 501 U.S. 429 (U.S. 1991) (consensual searches and identification requests during detention)
  • Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (U.S. 2005) (stop duration limited to the purpose of the stop)
  • Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (U.S. 2002) (totality-of-circumstances approach to reasonable suspicion)
  • Batchili, 113 Ohio St.3d 403 (2007-Ohio-2204) (prolonged stop evaluated on totality, not isolated facts)
  • Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (U.S. 1996) (review of reasonable-suspicion determinations as a mixed question of law and fact)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Emmons
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 17, 2016
Citation: 2016 Ohio 5384
Docket Number: C-150636
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.