History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Elkins
707 S.E.2d 744
N.C. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant robbed a Hot Spot store in Asheville on 28 January 2009, demanding cash while concealing his arm under a jacket, leading the clerk to fear he had a weapon.
  • The clerk, McHone, testified he gave Defendant money from the till after fearing a firearm, based on Defendant's demeanor and arm hiding.
  • Defendant was videotaped during the incident; he later wrote a statement admitting the act and citing hardship from his girlfriend's illness.
  • Defendant was indicted on common-law robbery and habitual felon status on 20 February 2009; tried November 30, 2009, in Buncombe County.
  • The jury convicted him of common-law robbery and he pled guilty to habitual felon status; the court sentenced him to 107–138 months and ordered restitution of $59.
  • On appeal, the court vacated the restitution amount but otherwise affirmed; the judgment remained otherwise valid.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of evidence for violence or fear State Elkins Sufficient evidence of violence or fear supports robbery
Admission of speculative testimony State Elkins Limiting admissibility upheld; testimony admissible as rational perception rather than mere speculation
Leading questions State Elkins Leading question error not plain error; other evidence supported the element
Plain error in Hawkins testimony and related evidence State Elkins No plain error; cumulative evidence still supported conviction; some errors but not prejudicial
Restitution amount support State Elkins Restitution amount not supported by record; vacate restitution portion

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Parker, 322 N.C. 559 (1988) (insufficient evidence of violence or fear in Parker; distinguishable)
  • State v. White, 142 N.C. App. 201 (2001) (sufficiency of fear where weapon implied by conduct)
  • State v. Moore, 279 N.C. 455 (1971) (firearm not essential to common-law robbery)
  • State v. Sipes, 233 N.C. 633 (1951) (force element may be actual or constructive)
  • State v. Sawyer, 224 N.C. 61 (1944) (fear suffices to compel surrender of property)
  • State v. Chapman, 359 N.C. 328 (2005) (substantial evidence standard for sufficiency review)
  • State v. Abshire, 363 N.C. 322 (2009) (substantial evidence framework and evidentiary considerations)
  • State v. Davis, 77 N.C. App. 68 (1985) (indistinct perception may be admissible if rationally based on observation)
  • State v. Carrillo, 164 N.C. App. 204 (2004) (lay opinion of guilt can be error but not plain error when other evidence exists)
  • State v. Gaither, 161 N.C. App. 96 (2003) (authentication and illustrative use of photographs and video evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Elkins
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 1, 2011
Citation: 707 S.E.2d 744
Docket Number: COA10-916
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.