History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Duran
2012 Ohio 2114
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Duran was stopped for speeding by a patrolman who conducted a traffic stop in Lorain County, Ohio.
  • A second officer arrived and a narcotics dog was brought to the scene to assist the stop.
  • The dog alerted at the front passenger door; officers searched the passenger compartment and back seating area.
  • A duffel bag behind the rear seat contained 31 pounds of marijuana.
  • Duran moved to suppress the marijuana, arguing the stop was impermissibly prolonged and, implicitly, that the dog sniff violated Miranda and/or extended detention.
  • The trial court found the alert supported only passenger-compartment evidence under Farris, and suppressed the marijuana; the State appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the dog’s alert gave probable cause to search beyond the passenger compartment. Duran's reliance on Farris to limit the search. State contends dog alert supports broader probable cause to search interior and trunk. Probable cause to search including space behind rear seat established.
Whether extending the stop for a dog sniff violated Fourth Amendment constraints. Duran challenged extension as impermissible. State contends no improper extension given dog alert. No improper extension shown by dash-cam; stop lawful.
Whether Caballes/Farris framework controls the trunk search in this compact car. Farris limits trunk search absent passenger-compartment contraband. Dog alert provides probable cause to search interior and space behind rear seats. Dog alert provided probable cause to search interior; marijuana not suppressed.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Farris, 109 Ohio St.3d 519 (Ohio 2006) (distinguishes suspects' compartments for probable cause in searches)
  • Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (S. Ct. 2005) (dog sniff during lawful stop does not violate Fourth Amendment)
  • State v. Moore, 90 Ohio St.3d 47 (Ohio 2000) (probable cause and constitutionality framework; state constitution reference)
  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1968) (createss reasonable suspicion standard for stop-and-frisk interaction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Duran
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 14, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 2114
Docket Number: 11CA009969
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.