2011 Ohio 4991
Ohio Ct. App.2011Background
- Agent Barnhardt received a confidential informant tip that Dowler would be picked up in a blue car to travel to Akron to manufacture methamphetamine, and that Dowler typically carried a silver briefcase with precursors.
- Surveillance showed a blue vehicle arrive at Dowler’s residence; Eric Cool retrieved music cases, guitar cases, and a black case from the residence before they left.
- Officer Bammerlin initiated a traffic stop after following the vehicle; a drug dog indicated the driver’s door, leading to a search of the vehicle.
- A black case in the trunk contained methamphetamine production-related items; no drugs were found in the initial search.
- Dowler was indicted for illegal assembly or possession of chemicals for the manufacture of drugs; he moved to suppress the stop and resulting seizure, which the trial court granted.
- The State appealed, challenging the suppression ruling; the appellate court affirmed the suppression denial, holding the stop lacked reasonable suspicion.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the stop of Dowler was valid under reasonable suspicion | Dowler, Dowler | Dowler | Stop lacked reasonable suspicion; suppression affirmed |
Key Cases Cited
- Maumee v. Weisner, 87 Ohio St.3d 295 (Ohio Supreme Court 1999) (reasonable suspicion required for investigative stop)
- Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325 (U.S. Supreme Court 1990) (informant tips require reliability or corroboration for stop)
- Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 (U.S. Supreme Court 1972) (informant tip can justify a stop if reliable)
- State v. Long, 127 Ohio App.3d 328 (Ohio 1998) (trustworthy factual determinations; mixed question of fact and law on suppression)
- Shepherd v. State, 122 Ohio App.3d 358 (Ohio 1997) (informer reliability/imputation concerns in corroboration analysis)
