2019 Ohio 3570
Ohio Ct. App.2019Background
- Defendant Shaun Dowdy pleaded guilty in 2013 to aggravated murder (with a three-year firearm specification) and kidnapping.
- Trial court sentenced aggravated murder to “20 years to life,” the firearm spec to 3 years, and kidnapping to 10 years, ordered consecutively for an aggregate “33 years to life.”
- Dowdy moved to correct what he alleged were void sentences; the trial court granted the motion in part and denied it in part.
- On appeal Dowdy challenged (1) the aggravated murder sentence as unauthorized by R.C. 2929.03(A) and (2) the kidnapping sentence as void for failing to initially impose postrelease control.
- This panel followed State v. Smith and held that a sentence phrased as “20 years to life” for aggravated murder was not authorized by the statute, vacating that sentence and remanding for resentencing on that count.
- The court upheld the trial court’s correction of postrelease control for the kidnapping conviction under R.C. 2929.191 and declined to order de novo resentencing.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Dowdy’s aggravated-murder sentence of “20 years to life” was unauthorized/void | The wording has the same practical effect as statutory “life with parole eligibility after 20 years” | The phrasing is not authorized by R.C. 2929.03(A); therefore the sentence is void | Vacated aggravated-murder sentence; remanded for resentencing (court follows State v. Smith) |
| Whether kidnapping sentence was void for not originally including postrelease control and whether de novo resentencing was required | Trial court properly corrected the omission under R.C. 2929.191 and imposed postrelease control at the correction hearing | Trial court should have resentenced de novo (argues Fischer was wrongly decided) | Overruled defendant; postrelease control correction was proper and no de novo resentencing required |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Fischer, 942 N.E.2d 332 (Ohio 2010) (approved procedure for correcting postrelease-control omissions under R.C. 2929.191)
- State v. Holdcroft, 1 N.E.3d 382 (Ohio 2013) (discussed R.C. 2929.191 correction authority and hearing requirements)
