History
  • No items yet
midpage
128 Conn. App. 198
Conn. App. Ct.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Police applied for a search warrant based on a notebook found at the defendant's residence near the computer, with web addresses appearing to relate to child pornography; the notebook corroborated by the affiant's observations and Vanessa Olivero's sworn statement.
  • A hard drive was allegedly hidden behind a bedroom mirror; a later review found additional devices and storage media during the November 30, 2007, search.
  • The search yielded a Gateway laptop, five hard drives, cameras, disks, and tapes; the defendant was charged with possession of child pornography in the first degree.
  • The motion to suppress the evidence was denied on September 21, 2009, and the defendant entered a conditional plea of nolo contendere under § 54-94a.
  • The appellate court reviews the suppression denial de novo for legal conclusions, with findings of fact reviewed for clear error; the issue is whether probable cause supported the warrant.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the warrant lacked probable cause State contends affidavit had sufficient facts DiMeco argues affidavit was conclusory and insufficient Probable cause established; warrant valid

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Lasaga, 269 Conn. 454 (2004) (probable cause standards; defer to magistrate's conclusions when warranted)
  • State v. Barton, 219 Conn. 529 (1991) (totality of the circumstances test for probable cause)
  • State v. Rodriguez, 223 Conn. 127 (1992) (corroboration and reliability considerations for informants)
  • State v. Glenn, 251 Conn. 567 (1999) (probable cause may rely on hearsay and informant information)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. DiMeco
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Apr 26, 2011
Citations: 128 Conn. App. 198; 15 A.3d 1204; 2011 Conn. App. LEXIS 213; AC 32202
Docket Number: AC 32202
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.
Log In