History
  • No items yet
midpage
350 Conn. 19
Conn.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Raikes Y. Delacruz-Gomez was convicted after a jury trial of assaulting public safety personnel and interfering with an officer in Waterbury, Connecticut.
  • The convictions stemmed from an incident where officers executing an arrest warrant for the defendant (and his son) forcibly entered his residence, during which the defendant injured a police officer.
  • At trial, the State introduced evidence specifying the felony charges (assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a firearm) listed in the defendant’s outstanding warrant and identified the law enforcement team as the "Violent Fugitive Task Force."
  • The defendant objected to the admission of the specific charge names and the task force designation, arguing they were unduly prejudicial.
  • The trial court admitted the evidence, the Appellate Court affirmed the conviction, and on certification the defendant appealed to the Connecticut Supreme Court.
  • The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, holding some evidence should have been excluded but that any error was harmless.

Issues

Issue Defendant's Argument State's Argument Held
Admission of warrant charge names Unduly prejudicial; portrays him as violent/dangerous Necessary to show officers’ conduct/reasonableness Properly admitted; probative value outweighed prejudice
Admission of "Violent Fugitive Task Force" name Prejudicial; labels defendant as a violent fugitive Explains officers’ presence/use of force Should not have been admitted; no probative value; harmless error

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Raynor, 175 Conn. App. 409 (2017) (discusses balancing probative value and prejudice in admitting evidence)
  • State v. Davis, 261 Conn. 553 (2002) (clarifies defense to assault/interfering with officer is lack of duty performance)
  • State v. Graham, 200 Conn. 9 (1986) (heightened prejudice when prior crime is similar to charged offense)
  • State v. Collins, 299 Conn. 567 (2011) (general rule against admitting prior misconduct evidence to show propensity)
  • State v. Nixon, 32 Conn. App. 224 (1993) (elements of assault of a peace officer under Connecticut law)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Delacruz-Gomez
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Jul 25, 2024
Citations: 350 Conn. 19; 323 A.3d 308; SC20828
Docket Number: SC20828
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
Log In
    State v. Delacruz-Gomez, 350 Conn. 19