State v. Deanda
2012 Ohio 408
Ohio Ct. App.2012Background
- Deanda was convicted of felonious assault after a May 2010 jury trial; he received a seven-year prison term.
- The incident occurred September 19, 2009, when Deanda stabbed Swartz multiple times and threatened to kill him.
- Swartz was severely injured and life-flighted to a hospital.
- Deanda was indicted on one count of attempted murder on September 23, 2009.
- The trial court instructed on felonious assault as a lesser included offense; on appeal, multiple errors were argued, and the court reversed and remanded.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether felonious assault was a valid lesser included offense of attempted murder | State contends Deem/Evans support no lesser offense in abstract | Deanda argues the court properly instructed on a lesser offense | Reversed; felonious assault not a proper lesser offense as charged |
| Admission of hearsay evidence over objection | State maintains hearsay was admissible | Deanda argues hearsay violated Evid.R. 802/803 | Prejudicial error found; assignment sustained; admissions harmful |
| Prosecutorial misconduct in closing rebuttal | State's rebuttal comments improper | Deanda asserts misconduct | Moot as prejudicial error found on other issue |
| Trial court's jury instruction on felonious assault as lesser included offense | State relies on Deem/Evans framework | Deanda argues improper instruction | Fourth assignment sustained; error reversible |
| Whether conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence | State argues sufficient evidence | Deanda contends weight favors acquittal | Moot due to other reversible errors |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Deem, 40 Ohio St.3d 205 (Ohio 1988) (three-part test for lesser included offenses (Deem))
- State v. Barnes, 94 Ohio St.3d 21 (Ohio 2002) (held that not every greater/lesser offense pairing follows identical language)
- State v. Evans, 122 Ohio St.3d 381 (Ohio 2009) (modified Deem test; deletes 'ever' and emphasizes statutory context and evidence-based instruction)
