State v. Dean M. Blatterman
864 N.W.2d 26
Wis.2015Background
- Blatterman was stopped following a wife's report that he might blow up the house by drawing gas in and may be intoxicated, with a history including prior OWI convictions.
- Police conducted a high-risk stop, detained Blatterman, observed chest pain, and sought medical assessment for potential carbon monoxide exposure and other concerns.
- Officers learned Blatterman had three prior OWI convictions, lowering the PAC threshold to 0.02% for this offender.
- Blatterman was transported to St. Mary's hospital for evaluation; EMS evaluated but Blatterman declined treatment at the scene.
- Hospital blood was drawn after Blatterman performed field sobriety tests; BAC measured 0.118%, exceeding the 0.02% PAC applicable to him.
- Blatterman moved to suppress the blood-test results as unlawful arrests; the circuit court denied, the court of appeals reversed, and the supreme court granted review.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the stop and detention were constitutionally reasonable | Blatterman—argues the stop was overbroad; lack of probable cause to arrest at the scene. | State—detention was based on reasonable suspicion and within Terry/§ 968.24 guidance; medical concerns justified extension. | Temporary detention supported by reasonable suspicion was reasonable. |
| Whether transporting to the hospital within the vicinity of the stop kept the detention lawful | Transport outside the vicinity turned the stop into an arrest without probable cause. | -k | Ten-mile transport exceeded the vicinity; thus not within the initial Terry detention. |
| Whether there was probable cause to arrest for PAC at the time of transport | Arrest/ testing should rely on circumstances at the time of transport with probable cause tied to PAC. | With knowledge of three prior OWI convictions, odor of intoxicants, and PAC threshold of 0.02%, probable cause existed to arrest for PAC. | There was probable cause to arrest for a 0.02% PAC offense at the time of transport. |
| Whether the community caretaker exception justified the transport | Transport to hospital could be justified as a community caretaker function in the absence of probable cause. | The officer acted as both caretaker and enforcer; transportation was reasonable to protect Blatterman and others. | Transportation to the hospital satisfied the community caretaker exception as a bona fide function. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Lange, 317 Wis. 2d 383 (Wis. 2009) (probable cause standard for PAC under .02% limit; arrest analysis)
- State v. Pinkard, 327 Wis.2d 346 (Wis. 2010) (community caretaker and detention reasonableness framework)
- State v. Vorburger, 255 Wis.2d 537 (Wis. 2002) (objective test for whether seizure escalates to arrest)
- State v. Goss, 338 Wis.2d 72 (Wis. 2011) (odor can establish probable cause to request PBT for .02% PAC offenders)
- State v. Colstad, 260 Wis.2d 406 (Wis. 2003) (medical assistance can justify extended detention in an accident scene)
- Kramer v. State, 315 Wis.2d 414 (Wis. 2008) (three-component test for community caretaker function)
- State v. Arias, 311 Wis.2d 358 (Wis. 2008) (standard for evaluating temporary detentions and certainty of suspect status)
- State v. Secrist, 224 Wis.2d 201 (Wis. 1999) (probable cause and its application in warrant-less arrests)
- Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433 (U.S. 1973) (community caretaking function_origin in vehicle contexts)
- Missouri v. McNeely, 569 U.S. _ (U.S. 2013) (blood draws in drunk-driving cases may require exigent circumstances or warrants)
