History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Davis
175 A.3d 71
| Conn. App. Ct. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Paul Davis, a gang member, drove a car during a retaliatory drive-by shooting; two passengers fired at a group of children, killing Kerry Foster Jr. and wounding another.
  • Defendant did not fire the weapon but drove the vehicle and aided in planning and post-shooting cover-up; he later provided statements to police and a written confession years later.
  • Prosecuted and convicted of accessory to murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and attempt to commit murder; convictions for conspiracy and attempt were previously affirmed.
  • On appeal, defendant raised an unpreserved claim that the trial court erred by instructing the jury it did not need to prove specific intent to kill the victim for accessory to murder; the claim was reviewed under the plain error doctrine after remand from the Connecticut Supreme Court.
  • Trial court instructed that the state must prove specific intent to kill, but did not have to prove the defendant intended to kill that particular victim (transferred intent theory); evidence showed no particular victim was targeted.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether jury instruction relieved prosecution of proving specific intent to kill for accessory to murder State: Instruction correctly explained law — specific intent required but need not be targeted at particular victim (transferred intent) Davis: Instruction misstated law and allowed conviction without proving specific intent to kill Court held instruction was correct: prosecution had to prove intent to kill someone, not necessarily that defendant intended to kill that specific victim; no plain error

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. McClain, 324 Conn. 802 (2017) (plain error standard and two-pronged test)
  • State v. Courchesne, 296 Conn. 622 (2010) (murder statute permits transferred intent)
  • State v. Carrion, 313 Conn. 823 (2014) (jury instructions evaluated as a whole for probable effect)
  • State v. Kitchens, 299 Conn. 447 (2011) (waiver of unpreserved claims)
  • State v. Davis, 163 Conn. App. 458 (2016) (trial facts and earlier appellate disposition)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Davis
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Nov 28, 2017
Citation: 175 A.3d 71
Docket Number: AC37582
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.