midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
2016 Ohio 7319
Ohio Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Alexander Davis pleaded guilty to one count of second-degree felony drug trafficking; a presentence investigation was prepared.
  • At sentencing the trial court imposed the maximum term of eight years in prison.
  • The trial court referenced Davis’s criminal history and stated several reasons under R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12 for a maximum sentence, including failure to respond to prior sanctions and an established pattern of criminal activity.
  • Davis argued the court relied on inaccuracies in his criminal-record recitation (mislabeling two attempted offenses as completed offenses and uncertainly referencing a robbery).
  • The appellate court found the misstatements harmless because most prior offenses were accurately described and the sentencing entry correctly listed convictions.
  • The court held the trial court erred in announcing post-release control as “up to three years” for a second-degree felony (which requires a definite three-year term) and remanded for limited resentencing on that issue under R.C. 2929.191.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court erred by imposing a maximum 8-year sentence State: Sentence is supported by the record and within statutory range Davis: Court relied on inaccurate criminal-history facts, making the maximum term improper Court: Maximum 8-year term supported; any mischaracterizations were harmless
Whether the trial court properly notified and imposed post-release control State: Court provided notice of post-release control Davis: Court misstated post-release control as "up to three years" for a second-degree felony Court: Error — second-degree non-sex felony requires a definite three-year post-release control term; remand for limited resentencing under R.C. 2929.191

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516, 2016-Ohio-1002 (discussing appellate review standards for felony sentences)
  • State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434 (establishing procedures and relief when post-release control notices are deficient)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Davis
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 7, 2016
Citations: 2016 Ohio 7319; 71 N.E.3d 1254; 15 BE 0034
Docket Number: 15 BE 0034
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In