2014 Ohio 1197
Ohio Ct. App.2014Background
- Appellant Scott Davis was convicted by jury of one count of domestic violence under R.C. 2919.25(A).
- The victim, David Delawder, testified he is appellant’s father; the relationship was characterized as father–son during trial.
- Delawder reported the March 17, 2013 assault and injuries; a deputy photographed the injuries and investigated but could not reach appellant.
- Appellant moved to continue to present an alibi defense; the trial court denied the continuance.
- Defense proffered alibi witnesses who would testify appellant was at a Cedar Run Road residence during the incident, but they were not produced at trial.
- The jury found Davis guilty; the trial court sentenced him to 90 days (60 suspended), two years’ probation, a $175 fine, and no-contact with the victim.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of evidence for family/household member | Davis is Delawder’s son; household relationship proven. | No formal documentation of paternity; credibility issues with the father’s testimony. | Sufficient evidence supports family/household member element |
| Admission of testimony linking paternal relationship (hearsay/credibility) | Delawder’s knowledge of paternity admissible; no hearsay error. | Testimony is hearsay and inappropriate as to paternity. | Admission not reversible error; evidence properly admitted |
| Denial of continuance for alibi witnesses | Alibi defense could have exculpated; continuance necessary for defense. | Court has discretion; delay would prejudice the state; alibi notice was untimely and witnesses unnamed. | No abuse of discretion; denial upheld |
| Ineffective assistance of counsel | Motion to acquit failed for lack of adequate relief; counsel’s handling of alibi and timing deficient. | Record shows sufficient evidence and counsel acted within reasonable professional standards. | No reversible ineffective assistance; trial counsel's performance not prejudicial |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259 (Ohio 1991) (sufficiency standard: rational trier could find elements proven beyond reasonable doubt)
- State v. Williams, 79 Ohio St.3d 459 (Ohio 1997) (domestic violence arises from the relationship of the parties, not living arrangements)
- State v. Sage, 31 Ohio St.3d 173 (Ohio 1987) (trial court broad discretion on evidentiary rulings)
- State v. Unger, 67 Ohio St.2d 65 (Ohio 1981) (continuance factors and abuse-of-discretion standard)
- State v. Holmes, 36 Ohio App.3d 44 (Ohio App. 1987) (continuance considerations and trial timing factors)
- Walden v. State, 47 Ohio St.3d 47 (Ohio 1989) (paternity-related evidence and credibility considerations in criminal cases)
