History
  • No items yet
midpage
2015 Ohio 458
Ohio Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant David Czech was arrested for multiple charges after an alleged OVI incident in November 2012 in Lucas County, Ohio.
  • He pleaded not guilty to four counts in Toledo Municipal Court; later entered a no contest plea to one count of OVI, with other counts off docketed.
  • The trial court explained the plea and later, upon reviewing BMV records, recalled the case and arguably changed penalties.
  • Czech was sentenced to 180 days in jail, a fine, and license-related penalties; the sentence was made consecutive.
  • Appellate counsel filed a no-merit brief under Anders; this court appointed new counsel and granted a delayed appeal.
  • The sole assignment of error claims the trial court violated R.C. 2937.07 by not calling for an explanation of circumstances before finding guilt.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court complied with R.C. 2937.07’s explanation of circumstances requirement. State contends review of the complaint sufficed. Czech argues no explanation of circumstances was required after no contest plea. Remanded; finding of guilt void for lack of adequate explanation.

Key Cases Cited

  • City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Bowers, 9 Ohio St.3d 148 (1984) (no contest plea requires an explanation of circumstances; statute confers substantive rights)
  • State v. Herbst, 2004-Ohio-3157 (2004) (mandatory explanation of circumstances; cannot rely on silent record)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Czech
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 6, 2015
Citations: 2015 Ohio 458; L-13-1141
Docket Number: L-13-1141
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In