History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Crossley
2016 Ohio 3196
Ohio Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • On May 22, 2014, police responded to a domestic disturbance at 509 E. Norman Ave., Springfield, Ohio; Officer Freeman saw Jamar Crossley leave a porch and walk to a nearby chain‑link fence.
  • Freeman did not see a gun on Crossley; she heard a clang at the fence and then found a loaded Glock 17 with a 30‑round magazine lying next to the fence where Crossley had stood.
  • Officer Nichols arrested Crossley at the scene; a search incident to arrest yielded several .45 caliber rounds in his pocket.
  • Forensic comparison at BCI produced a partial latent print on the handgun matching Crossley’s left ring finger.
  • Indicted on having a weapon while under disability, possession of heroin (to which he pled guilty), and carrying a concealed weapon (CCW); convicted by jury of weapon under disability and CCW.
  • Sentenced to an aggregate 45 months; Crossley appealed solely arguing insufficient evidence for CCW because the gun was not shown to be concealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether evidence was sufficient to prove CCW (R.C. 2923.12) State: testimony and physical evidence place the loaded gun where Crossley had been standing and a matching latent print—permissible inference he concealed and then discarded it Crossley: gun was not shown to be concealed; mere presence near where a gun was found is insufficient Court: Evidence sufficient. Because officer did not observe the gun on Crossley and it was later found where he had been, a reasonable inference supports concealment and guilt

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (sufficiency standard explained)
  • State v. Goff, 82 Ohio St.3d 123 (credibility not for appellate sufficiency review)
  • State v. DeHass, 10 Ohio St.2d 230 (appellate review limits on witness credibility)
  • State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259 (standard for sufficiency; viewing evidence in light most favorable to prosecution)
  • Michalic v. Cleveland Tankers, Inc., 364 U.S. 325 (circumstantial and direct evidence equally probative)
  • Donaldson v. Northern Trading Co., 82 Ohio App.3d 476 (weight of inferences from circumstantial evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Crossley
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 27, 2016
Citation: 2016 Ohio 3196
Docket Number: 2015-CA-60
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.