History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Crider
2013 Ohio 4594
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Edward C. Crider was indicted on kidnapping and attempted rape charges; he pleaded guilty to abduction (R.C. 2905.02(A)(2)) and attempted gross sexual imposition (R.C. 2923.02/2907.05(A)(4)); another kidnapping count was nolled.
  • The victim was a 12-year-old girl whom Crider grabbed, dragged toward and pressed against a chain-link fence, attempted to push into bushes to hide, and shouted at during the encounter.
  • At sentencing the court heard victim impact testimony describing emotional and academic effects on the child.
  • Trial court imposed consecutive prison terms: 36 months for abduction and 18 months for attempted gross sexual imposition (total 54 months).
  • Crider appealed, arguing (1) the offenses merge as allied offenses of similar import and (2) the court failed to make the statutory findings required for consecutive sentences under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether abduction and attempted gross sexual imposition are allied offenses requiring merger State: offenses were separate given the facts; convictions may stand separately Crider: offenses arose from a single course of conduct and share the same animus, so they must merge Court: Not allied — restraint/movement was secretive and increased risk of harm, showing separate animus; convictions do not merge
Whether the trial court made required R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings to impose consecutive sentences State: court’s explanation and victim impact support consecutive terms Crider: court did not make the statutorily required proportionality and other findings on the record Court: Reverse in part — court failed to make all distinct statutory findings (notably the proportionality finding); consecutive sentence vacated and case remanded for resentencing

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Johnson, 942 N.E.2d 1061 (Ohio 2010) (adopted conduct-based test for allied-offenses merger)
  • State v. Logan, 397 N.E.2d 1345 (Ohio 1979) (sets separate-animus and substantial-risk guidance for kidnapping-related offenses)
  • State v. Edmonson, 715 N.E.2d 131 (Ohio 1999) (trial court must engage required analysis before imposing consecutive sentences)
  • State v. Rance, 710 N.E.2d 699 (Ohio 1999) (overruled by Johnson on allied-offenses analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Crider
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 17, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 4594
Docket Number: 99396
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.