State v. Collins
299 Neb. 160
| Neb. | 2018Background
- Collins pled no contest to a reduced charge of first degree sexual assault (Class II felony) under a plea agreement; sentenced to 10–15 years with credit for time served.
- On direct appeal he challenged sentence and multiple ineffective-assistance claims; the court affirmed sentence and found the record insufficient to resolve many counsel-related claims.
- Collins filed a postconviction petition reasserting several ineffective-assistance claims that were not addressed on direct appeal and moved for appointment of postconviction counsel.
- The district court denied postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing, finding most claims insufficiently pleaded or without merit, and denied appointment of counsel.
- Collins appealed; the Nebraska Supreme Court reviewed the denial de novo and affirmed the district court.
Issues
| Issue | Collins' Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Collins alleged sufficient facts to require an evidentiary hearing on ineffective-assistance claims | Counsel failed to: attack the information for jurisdictional defects; seek DNA testing or investigate missing evidence kit; move to discharge on speedy-trial grounds; move to sever; depose witnesses or share transcripts; move to exclude witness/victim testimony; and coerced plea | Many claims were conclusory or unsupported by facts; some claims were refuted by the record; others would be meritless and thus not ineffective assistance | No evidentiary hearing required. Most claims were insufficiently pleaded or without merit; record affirmatively refuted coercion-of-plea claim, so no relief granted. |
| Validity of original information / jurisdictional defect | Dates in original information allegedly created a jurisdictional problem because some conduct and victim residence predated alleged dates | Amended information alleged the offense in Douglas County within operative dates; the January 2009–June 2010 dates were irrelevant to the operative charge | Collins failed to identify any jurisdictional defect in the operative information; no deficient performance or prejudice shown. |
| Failure to request DNA testing / investigate missing sexual-assault kit | Counsel should have sought DNA testing or investigated lack of kit; such testing might have suppressed State evidence or produced exculpatory evidence | Collins did not allege what DNA or kit would have produced; the charged acts involved non-penile digital conduct across many incidents, so there may have been no testable evidence | Claim insufficiently pleaded; counsel cannot be ineffective for failing to pursue testing when no plausible evidence to test was alleged. |
| Failure to move to discharge on speedy-trial grounds | Speedy-trial clock had run before plea; counsel should have sought discharge | When calculating deadlines and excluding periods (motions and continuances), trial deadline had not passed before the plea; a meritless motion cannot be the basis for ineffective assistance | No prejudice: speedy-trial deadline had not run; counsel not ineffective for failing to raise a meritless speedy-trial discharge motion. |
| Failure to appoint postconviction counsel | Collins asserted entitlement to counsel because his petition raised justiciable issues | Appointment of counsel is required only if petition alleges justiciable issues; here petition raised none warranting an evidentiary hearing | Denial of appointment was not an abuse of discretion because petition presented no justiciable issue of fact or law. |
Key Cases Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (establishes two-prong ineffective-assistance standard: deficient performance and prejudice)
- State v. Collins, 292 Neb. 602 (prior direct-appeal decision in this matter)
- State v. Schwaderer, 296 Neb. 932 (discusses ineffective-assistance standards)
- State v. Betancourt-Garcia, 295 Neb. 170 (speedy-trial calculation and discharge standard)
- State v. Johnson, 298 Neb. 491 (review standards for postconviction dismissal without hearing)
- State v. Ely, 295 Neb. 607 (appointment of postconviction counsel required only when petition raises justiciable issues)
