257 N.C. App. 780
N.C. Ct. App.2018Background
- On May 29, 2015, Officer Costa stopped Coley for expired tags, smelled marijuana, and asked him to exit the car.
- Officers found 11.5 grams of marijuana in two sandwich bags (8.6 g in glove compartment; 2.9 g in center console), a digital scale, an open box of sandwich bags, 23 loose sandwich bags, two partially smoked cigars, and about $800 on Coley.
- Coley told officers he kept the scale to verify amounts he bought and that dealers didn’t supply bags, so he provided his own; he said one bag was forgotten and of poor quality.
- Coley was indicted for possession with intent to sell/deliver marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia; the jury convicted him after the trial court denied his motions to dismiss.
- Coley appealed the denial of the motion to dismiss; the Court of Appeals granted certiorari (despite a defective notice of appeal) and reviewed the sufficiency of the evidence de novo.
Issues
| Issue | State's Argument | Coley's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether evidence was sufficient to support a conviction for possession with intent to sell or deliver marijuana | Packaging (two sandwich bags plus 23 loose bags and an open box), presence of a digital scale, and cash permit an inference of intent to sell | 11.5 grams is too small; scale and bags used only to verify personal purchases and because dealers didn’t supply bags | The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the State, was sufficient; trial court did not err in denying the motion to dismiss |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Blakney, 233 N.C. App. 516 (evidence of multiple packaged bags, scale, box of bags, and large cash supported intent to sell)
- State v. Williams, 71 N.C. App. 136 (packaging into multiple small envelopes supported inference of intent despite modest total weight)
- State v. Baxter, 285 N.C. 735 (manner of packaging and quantity can allow jury to infer intent to distribute)
- State v. Wilkins, 208 N.C. App. 729 (small quantity and packaging consistent with personal use can be insufficient to infer intent absent other factors)
- State v. Nettles, 170 N.C. App. 100 (small quantity and minimal paraphernalia consistent with user rather than seller)
