midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2022 Ohio 809
Ohio Ct. App.
2022
Read the full case

Background:

  • Coleman pleaded guilty to first-degree attempted murder (with a 3-year firearm specification), second-degree felonious assault (with a 1-year firearm specification), and third-degree weapons under disability.
  • The trial court imposed indefinite minimum prison terms under the Reagan Tokes Law: 4 years (attempted murder) + 3-year firearm spec, and 4 years (felonious assault as reflected in the sentencing transcript) + 1-year firearm spec; weapons offense concurrent; aggregate sentence computed as 8–10 years under R.C. 2929.144(B)(3).
  • The sentencing journal entry mistakenly listed a 3-year base term for felonious assault; the court remanded for a nunc pro tunc entry to reflect the 4-year term actually imposed at sentencing.
  • Coleman appealed, arguing the Reagan Tokes Law is unconstitutional as applied to first- and second-degree felonies because it violates the right to jury trial, separation of powers, and due process.
  • The Eighth District, citing its en banc decision in State v. Delvallie, overruled Coleman’s constitutional challenges and affirmed the sentence; a concurrence/dissent note indicates one judge would have found parts of R.C. 2967.271 unconstitutional.

Issues:

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the Reagan Tokes Law’s indefinite sentencing for 1st- and 2nd-degree felonies violates the constitutional rights to jury trial, separation of powers, and due process The State contends the Reagan Tokes framework is constitutional and the trial court properly imposed an indefinite term under the statute Coleman argues Reagan Tokes (R.C. 2967.271) infringes jury trial, separation of powers, and due process guarantees The court followed its en banc precedent in Delvallie, overruled the constitutional challenges, and affirmed the sentence; remanded only to correct the clerical sentencing entry

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Harper, 159 N.E.3d 248 (Ohio 2020) (limits on raising challenges to the validity of a sentence on direct appeal when parties do not raise specific objections)
  • State v. Henderson, 162 N.E.3d 776 (Ohio 2020) (similar limitation on appellate review of sentencing validity when issues are not properly preserved)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Coleman
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 17, 2022
Citations: 2022 Ohio 809; 110096
Docket Number: 110096
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In