History
  • No items yet
midpage
2014 Ohio 5275
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Darrell Coleman pled guilty in three Cuyahoga County cases after retracting not-guilty pleas.
  • Sentencing hearing occurred on December 27, 2013, with a recommended 30 years to life prison term in the plea.
  • In CR-13-571165-B, Coleman received life with parole after 30 years for aggravated murder, plus eight-year terms for two counts of aggravated robbery and involuntary manslaughter, all concurrent.
  • In CR-13-571726-A, Coleman received an eight-year aggravated robbery sentence to run consecutively to the CR-571165-B term.
  • In CR-13-572096-A, Coleman received four eight-year terms for aggravated robbery, concurrent to each other but consecutive to the other counts, for an aggregate life sentence with parole eligibility after 46 years.
  • Appellant challenged the consecutive-sentencing scheme for lacking on-record reasons; the court ultimately affirmed but remanded to correct journal entries.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether consecutive sentences require court-stated reasons on the record Coleman insists record-reason support is required State contends Bonnell allows no such on-record reasons requirement No on-record reasons required; Bonnell permits findings but not explicit reasons on record
Whether the findings necessary for consecutiveness were properly made Findings were made but not reflected in journal entries Findings were stated at sentencing and supported by the record Findings were made and supported; journal entries must reflect them nunc pro tunc
Remedy for missing journal-entry findings Appellant seeks reversal or resentencing State seeks to preserve sentence as imposed Remand for nunc pro tunc entries to include findings and comply with Bonnell

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Bonnell, 140 Ohio St.3d 209 (2014) (no requirement to state reasons on the record for consecutive sentences; findings must appear in journal entry)
  • State v. Venes, 992 N.E.2d 453 (8th Dist. Ohio, 2013) (concurrent vs. consecutive findings and record requirements recognized in 8th Dist.)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Coleman
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 26, 2014
Citations: 2014 Ohio 5275; 100888 100924 101925
Docket Number: 100888 100924 101925
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Coleman, 2014 Ohio 5275