History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Coleman
37 A.3d 713
Conn.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Coleman was convicted of murder under § 53a-54a for stabbing his girlfriend Twonna White and was sentenced to 45 years.
  • The 911 call and subsequent statements showed Coleman admitting to stabbing White with a fork and knife.
  • White survived initial medical aid but later died from a single chest stab wound; autopsy showed mostly nonfatal wounds except the fatal chest wound.
  • The defense sought lesser-included offenses and extreme emotional disturbance instruction; the court granted those and instructed accordingly.
  • At trial, the jury accepted murder as proven; this direct appeal followed challenging sufficiency, jury instruction on intent from wounds, and prosecutorial remarks.
  • The court reviewed the sufficiency of evidence using a two-step standard and analyzed preservation/waiver of the instruction issue.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of intent to kill Coleman argues the evidence shows only manslaughter, not specific intent to kill. Coleman contends the state failed to prove conscious objective to kill beyond a reasonable doubt. Evidence supports intent to kill; jury could infer from weapon, wound pattern, and statements.
Instruction allowing inference of intent from wounds State argues wounds and instrument can show intent; defense says instruction was unbalanced. Coleman asserts the instruction was improper given most wounds were superficial and defense evidence should be considered. Waiver/absence of proper preservation bars Golding/plain-error relief; no reversible error found.
Prosecutorial impropriety in closing State contends minor rebuttal comment did not deny due process given total trial context. Coleman argues the remark implied guilt and personal belief, undermining fairness. Isolated comment not enough to deny due process under Williams factors; no reversal.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Papandrea, 302 Conn. 340 (2011) (standard for sufficiency on circumstantial evidence of intent)
  • State v. Payne, 303 Conn. 538 (2012) (prosecutorial misconduct; curative measures; totality of the record)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Coleman
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Mar 20, 2012
Citation: 37 A.3d 713
Docket Number: 18519
Court Abbreviation: Conn.