midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
2025 Ohio 4410
Ohio
2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Clark was convicted on multiple rape and gross sexual imposition counts involving a minor and pled guilty to several counts in 2016.
  • After sentencing, Clark obtained new counsel and later sought to proceed with a direct appeal from Medina County case 16 CR 0734.
  • Clark appealed to Ninth District; one assignment claimed improper waiver of counsel and Crim.R. 44(A) written waiver noncompliance.
  • Ninth District reversed or remanded on some issues but ultimately affirmed, granting Clark’s App.R. 26(B) reopening based on allegedly ineffective appellate counsel.
  • Upon reopening, the Ninth District required Clark to address whether prior appellate counsel was ineffective and prejudice from that deficiency.
  • Clark’s reopened-appeal brief largely failed to separately argue ineffective-counsel claim with Strickland prejudice, leading to dismissal of merits.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether App.R. 26(B)(7) requires addressing ineffective counsel and prejudice Clark State Mandatory; must address deficiency and prejudice
Whether failure to address Strickland test bars review in reopened appeal Clark State Failure to address test defeats review; result affirmed
Whether supplemental briefing is available to resolve issues in reopened appeals Clark State Appellate court may order supplemental briefing
Whether the court should adopt a presumption approach to counsel ineffectiveness when arguments are not separately raised Clark dissent State Court rejected presumption; required explicit App.R. 26(B)(7) showing

Key Cases Cited

  • Murnahan, 63 Ohio St.3d 60 (Ohio 1991) (allows delayed reconsideration for ineffective appellate-counsel claims)
  • State v. Leyh, 2022-Ohio-292 (Ohio 2022) (reopened-appeal framework; strata for Strickland test in reopening)
  • State v. Davis, 2008-Ohio-4608 (Ohio 2008) (sets standard for briefing deficiencies and res judicata relevance)
  • State v. Talley, 2023-Ohio-883 (Ohio 2023) (presumption approach for ineffective assistance in reopened appeals used elsewhere)
  • State v. Carver, 2023-Ohio-2839 (Ohio 2023) (reopened-appeal review of ineffective-assistance claims)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Clark
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 24, 2025
Citations: 2025 Ohio 4410; 2024-0401 & 2024-0539
Docket Number: 2024-0401 & 2024-0539
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In