History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Chun
215 N.J. 489
| N.J. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • This Court previously issued a unanimous opinion on the Alcotest 7110 MKXII-C reliability (Chun).
  • Motions M-1538, M-1540 argued State failed to implement March 17, 2008 Order and central database integrity.
  • M-1539 sought to modify the Order to allow continued use of Firmware 3.11; State asserted 3.13 would render the database unusable.
  • State presented affidavits from OFS Director Baum and researcher Alaouie regarding database integrity.
  • Defendants argued noncompliance with Paragraph 2 of the March 17 Order and that Alcotest is unreliable.
  • Amicus urged appointment of a Special Master to oversee compliance and enforcement.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the State complied with the March 17, 2008 Order on the centralized database Chun argues State failed integrity safeguards State contends database is compliant Yes; database is fully in compliance
Whether to grant relief from compliance with Paragraph 2 of the Order Defendants contend noncompliance warrants relief State shows unanticipated adverse impact from 3.13 Granted; State excused from Paragraph 2
Whether Alcotest 3.11 remains scientifically reliable and admissible Alcotest 3.11 is unreliable under 3.11 3.11 remains reliable with proper procedures Yes; 3.11 remains reliable and admissible under the Order
Whether 3.13 would render the database unusable and justify avoidance of compliance 3.13 would impair database viability 3.13 would render database unusable Found that 3.13 would adversely affect database viability; relief granted
Whether a remedy is needed to protect equal protection for women over 60 in AIR admissibility Air results inadmissible; need equal protection remedy No additional remedy required beyond Order Additional remedy deemed necessary; special protection for women over 60

Key Cases Cited

  • Pasqua v. Council, 186 N.J. 127 (N.J. 2006) (willful noncompliance not shown; compliance context cited)
  • Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. Twp. Comm. of Manalapan, 140 N.J. 366 (N.J. 1995) (unanticipated adverse impact governs compliance flexibility)
  • Pasqua v. Council, 186 N.J. 127 (N.J. 2006) ((repeated) standard for willful noncompliance)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Chun
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Sep 18, 2013
Citation: 215 N.J. 489
Court Abbreviation: N.J.