State v. Cheffen
297 Kan. 689
| Kan. | 2013Background
- Cheffen was convicted of first-degree felony murder under K.S.A. 21-3401(b) based on the underlying felony of child abuse resulting in Kawliga’s death.
- Cheffen challenges three issues: (i) jury polling timing violated K.S.A. 22-3421, (ii) the felony-murder language creates alternative means, and (iii) entitlement to a lesser included offense instruction on second-degree murder.
- Medical and forensic evidence showed Kawliga had a severe head injury, including a skull fracture and subdural hematoma, with retinal hemorrhaging and signs of battered-child syndrome.
- Autopsy confirmed battered-child syndrome; investigators found Kawliga’s DNA on Wiseman’s white onesie and on Cheffen’s clothing; holes in Wiseman’s wall contained mixed DNA including Kawliga’s.
- Cheffen testified he did not harm Kawliga and offered alternative explanations for the injuries; Wiseman testified he was panicked but cooperated with treatment.
- The jury was instructed only on first-degree felony murder; no lesser included instructions were requested or given; verdict was read after a joint polling question was asked.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jury polling preservation | Cheffen contends polling did not follow 22-3421 timing and should be preserved. | Cheffen failing to object posttrial prevents review under Holt and related precedents. | Not preserved; Holt contemporaneous objection rule applies. |
| Alternative means in felony murder | Language ‘in the commission of, attempt to commit, or flight from’ creates alternative means requiring separate proof. | Language describes circumstances proving the same element, not separate means. | Not alternative means; statute describes circumstances, not separate elements. |
| Second-degree intentional murder instruction | Evidence supports inferring intent to kill; instruction required. | Evidence did not establish defendant’s state of mind; instruction not appropriate. | Not clearly erroneous; overwhelming evidence supported felony murder; instruction not reversible error. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Bailey, 292 Kan. 449 (2011) (different underlying felonies can be alternative means in felony murder analysis)
- State v. Holt, 285 Kan. 760 (2008) (contemporaneous objection rule for jury polling inquiries)
- State v. Gray, 45 Kan. App. 2d 522 (2011) (polling to safeguard unanimity and finality; later disavowed as precedent)
- State v. Williams, 295 Kan. 506 (2012) (preservation for instruction claims; clearly erroneous standard)
- State v. Simmons, 295 Kan. 171 (2012) (lesser included offenses when evidence supports; error review)
- State v. Deal, 293 Kan. 872 (2012) (intent focus for second-degree murder; inferring intent from evidence)
- State v. Calvin, 279 Kan. 193 (2005) (second-degree murder as lesser included offense under felony murder)
- State v. Ahrens, 296 Kan. 151 (2012) (disallowed automatic creation of alternative means in DUI statutes)
- State v. Aguirre, 296 Kan. 99 (2012) (aggravated intimidation not alternative means; focus on prohibited conduct)
