History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Cash
951 N.E.2d 486
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Ann Cash was convicted in Dayton Municipal Court of assault, a misdemeanor of the first degree, following a bench trial.
  • The incident occurred around 12:50 a.m. on July 26, 2009, at 4114 Silven Drive, Dayton, involving Vanessa Robinson, Jerome Hunt, and Cash.
  • Robinson testified Cash punched her after a verbal altercation about Robinson’s relationship with Hunt; Robinson needed medical treatment for facial injuries.
  • Hunt and Cash claimed Robinson started the fight and Cash acted in self-defense; Robinson testified Cash punched her first.
  • A pretrial protective order under R.C. 2903.213 was issued prohibiting Cash from contacting Robinson; the order was reaffirmed as part of Cash’s sentence.
  • Cash was sentenced to a $100 fine plus costs; the protective order was continued.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Cumulative-error claim denied fair trial State argues multiple trial errors deprived due process. Cash argues cumulative errors violated fair trial rights. Cumulative error not established; assignment overruled.
Continuation of protection order in sentence State concedes authority to continue order as part of sentence was lacking. Cash challenges continuation of the protection order in sentencing. Second assignment sustained; order terminated by operation of law; judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. DeMarco, 31 Ohio St.3d 191 (Ohio 1987) (cumulative-errors standard in evaluating fair-trial claims)
  • State v. Ross, 2010-Ohio-843 (Ohio Ct. App.) (abuse of discretion in limiting cross-examination; standard review)
  • State v. Cobb, 81 Ohio App.3d 179 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991) (trial court broad discretion on cross-examination scope)
  • State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (Ohio 1997) (sufficiency of evidence standard; take view favorable to State)
  • State v. Bridgeman, 55 Ohio St.2d 261 (Ohio 1978) (sufficiency review requires reasonable minds could differ)
  • State v. Miley, 114 Ohio App.3d 738 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996) (sufficiency review standard for trial court ruling)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Cash
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 25, 2011
Citation: 951 N.E.2d 486
Docket Number: 23731
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.