midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2014 Ohio 5403
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Angela Cascarelli pleaded guilty in 2010 to aggravated robbery (third-degree felony) and was sentenced to three years' incarceration.
  • She was granted judicial release in August 2011 and placed on community control for three years.
  • In 2013 Cascarelli pled guilty to possession of heroin and was charged with violating community control.
  • At the August 16, 2013 probation-violation hearing, the court reviewed her criminal history, counseling participation, and Turning Point program involvement.
  • The trial court revoked community control and reinstated the remainder of her original prison sentence.
  • Cascarelli appealed, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel because defense counsel allegedly was ignorant of her substance-abuse history and failed to seek evaluation or placement in treatment/alternative sanctions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to secure or request treatment/alternative sanctions based on Cascarelli’s substance-abuse history State: Counsel’s performance was not shown to be deficient and Cascarelli produced no prejudice from counsel’s actions Cascarelli: Counsel was ignorant of her addiction, failed to request evaluation/placement at treatment or Community Corrections, and thus was ineffective Court affirmed: record shows counsel knew of substance-abuse issues, advocated for treatment/alternative sanctions, and Cascarelli failed to prove deficient performance or prejudice

Key Cases Cited

  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (two-part ineffective-assistance test: deficient performance and prejudice)
  • State v. Williams, 99 Ohio St.3d 493 (2003) (Ohio discussion of ineffective-assistance standards)
  • State v. Calhoun, 86 Ohio St.3d 279 (1999) (ineffectiveness claim challenges fundamental fairness of the proceeding)
  • State v. Wesson, 137 Ohio St.3d 455 (2013) (presumption that counsel’s conduct falls within reasonable professional assistance)
  • State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1 (2006) (trial court has broad discretion in imposing sentence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Cascarelli
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 3, 2014
Citations: 2014 Ohio 5403; 13 MA 145
Docket Number: 13 MA 145
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In