History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Carter
2011 Ohio 6700
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Carter appeals Greene County Common Pleas rulings after denying suppression motions in a drug-trafficking case.
  • Controlled buys of ecstasy by a confidential informant, coordinated by the ACE Task Force, led to a search warrant for Carter’s apartment.
  • Affidavit details three buys, surveillance, and connections to a neighbor/ supplier known as 'D' or Rose.
  • Search warrant for 1777 Arlin Pl, Apt H, Fairborn, executed Dec 11, 2009; drugs and weapons found.
  • Carter indicted for conspiracy and complicity to trafficking, marijuana offenses, plus firearm specification; suppression motions denied.
  • Carter later pleaded no contest to three counts of complicity to aggravated trafficking; other counts-dismissed; concurrent four-year terms; forfeiture ordered.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Probable cause sufficiency for the search warrant State argues affidavit provided a fair probability evidence would be found at H. Carter contends affidavit lacked sufficient nexus to H. Overruled; warrant supported by probable cause.
Miranda rights and suppression of statements State contends Carter was properly advised; video lacked time-stamp but shows rights acknowledged. Carter claims rights were not provided before questioning; credibility for timing disputed. Overruled; trial court credited officers; statements not suppressed.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. George, 45 Ohio St.3d 325 (Ohio 1989) (probable-cause standard for search warrants; substantial basis required for probable cause)
  • Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (U.S. Supreme Court 1983) (totality-of-the-circumstances approach to probable cause)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Carter
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 23, 2011
Citation: 2011 Ohio 6700
Docket Number: 2011 CA 11
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.