State v. Campfield
213 N.J. 218
| N.J. | 2013Background
- Defendant Kevin Campfield fatally drowned Ivory Bennett after a confrontation on January 17, 2006.
- Campfield admitted, after drinking, to punching Bennett, robbing him, and forcing him to remove most of his clothing on a cold night.
- Bennett’s death occurred after being chased into woods where he died from drowning; bodily injuries included blunt head trauma.
- Campfield pled guilty to second-degree reckless manslaughter and second-degree robbery under a plea agreement, with eight and seven year sentences consecutive and subject to NERA.
- Appellate Division vacated the reckless manslaughter conviction for an inadequate factual basis; the Court granted certification.
- Supreme Court reinstated the conviction, holding the plea had an adequate factual basis under Rule 3:9-2, and remanded for Barboza-style restoration of charges if remand occurs.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the plea colloquy provided an adequate factual basis for reckless manslaughter. | State argues admissions showed reckless disregard and causation. | Campfield contends the colloquy failed to prove awareness of risk of death. | Yes; the colloquy established a sufficient factual basis. |
| Whether causation and mens rea were proven for recklessness under N.J.S.A. 2C:11-4(b). | State contends risk was consciously disregarded; death within scope of risk. | Defendant argues lack of explicit admission to risk of death. | Adequate proof of recklessness and causation found. |
| What is the proper remedy if a plea lacks a sufficient factual basis on appeal. | State urges reinstate all counts and restore pre-plea positions. | Remedy should follow Barboza, vacating only the deficient plea. | Remand with Barboza-style restoration appropriate; majority’s full reinstatement of charges согласен with Barboza. |
Key Cases Cited
- State ex rel. T.M., 166 N.J. 319 (2001) (factual basis must exist for plea; record aids appellate review)
- State v. Sainz, 107 N.J. 283 (1987) (elements must be addressed in plea colloquy)
- State v. Smullen, 118 N.J. 408 (1990) (admissible basis must come from defendant's admissions)
- State v. Barboza, 115 N.J. 415 (1989) (remedy when plea lacks adequate factual basis: vacate and restore positions)
- State v. Williams, 190 N.J. 114 (2007) (recklessness requires conscious disregard of substantial unjustified risk)
- State v. Pelham, 176 N.J. 448 (2003) (jury must examine causal relationship and intervening causes)
- State v. Jenkins, 178 N.J. 347 (2004) (recklessness may involve risk of death even if not certain)
- State v. Lightner, 99 N.J. 313 (1985) (remedy and approach when plea lacks adequate factual basis)
