History
  • No items yet
midpage
2024 Ohio 1693
Ohio Ct. App.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Payton Campbell was convicted following a jury trial for attempted murder and felonious assault with firearm specifications stemming from a shooting outside the Medusa nightclub in Cleveland, Ohio in March 2022.
  • The incident began with an ongoing feud between two rap artists (Finley and Collins), escalated to a physical altercation, and culminated in multiple parties being shot, including alleged bystanders.
  • Campbell, an Atlanta resident and Finley’s boyfriend, fired multiple shots during the chaotic fight; victims included Bianca Smith (multiple injuries), Quasean Townsend (foot wound), and Fatihah Majid (grazed by bullet). Collins was also shot but Campbell was acquitted of charges involving her.
  • The defense argued self-defense and sought related jury instructions, including transferred intent for self-defense as applied to injuries suffered by bystanders.
  • The trial court sentenced Campbell to an aggregate term of 14 to 16.5 years, after convicting him on multiple counts and imposing consecutive firearm enhancements.
  • On appeal, Campbell challenged the verdict on grounds of manifest weight and sufficiency of the evidence, adequacy of jury instructions, Confrontation Clause violations, evidence authentication, and legality of consecutive firearm specifications.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Verdict against manifest weight; self-defense Evidence shows Campbell not acting in self-defense; jury could credit state’s witnesses Campbell was defending himself and Finley; shooting justified Verdict not against weight; jury credited state’s evidence
Failure to instruct on transferred intent/self-defense Not required; transferred intent self-defense unsettled in district Lack of instruction prejudiced self-defense argument for bystanders No reversible error; instruction would not have changed outcome
Sufficiency of evidence on intent and causation Victims’ and video testimony established purpose/knowledge; transferred intent for bystanders State did not prove Campbell knowingly caused harm/risk to Smith/bystanders Sufficient evidence supported convictions
Admission/authentication of Townsend evidence (Confrontation) Medical records/statements for treatment are admissible; video identified by nurse Out-of-court statements violated confrontation rights; video not authenticated No violation; records/treatment admissions standard met; authentication sufficient
Consecutive firearm specifications Permissible under R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(g) for most serious offenses All offenses were part of same act; only one firearm term allowed Sentencing proper under statutory exception

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Wilks, 154 Ohio St.3d 359 (Ohio 2018) (standard for reviewing manifest weight of the evidence claims)
  • State v. Messenger, 171 Ohio St.3d 227 (Ohio 2022) (burden of persuasion in self-defense cases)
  • State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259 (Ohio 1991) (standard for sufficiency of the evidence)
  • State v. Barnes, 94 Ohio St.3d 21 (Ohio 2002) (elements and law of self-defense)
  • Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (U.S. 2004) (Confrontation Clause and testimonial hearsay)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Campbell
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 2, 2024
Citations: 2024 Ohio 1693; 242 N.E.3d 1259; 112958
Docket Number: 112958
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Campbell, 2024 Ohio 1693