History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Cameron Everett Post
|
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Cameron Everett Post pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter (I.C. § 18-4006(2)) and use of a deadly weapon (I.C. § 19-2520).
  • District court imposed a unified 10-year sentence (2 years determinate) for manslaughter and a consecutive unified 5-year sentence (2 years determinate) for the weapon enhancement.
  • Post filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion seeking reduction of sentence based on additional information (restitution uncertainty, financial hardship to family, prison placement, etc.).
  • The district court denied the I.C.R. 35 motion, concluding the information was largely a restatement of matters already considered and did not justify leniency.
  • Post appealed, challenging both the reasonableness of his sentence and the denial of his I.C.R. 35 motion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the overall sentence was an abuse of discretion Post: sentence is excessive/unreasonable State/District: sentence within trial court discretion after considering relevant factors Affirmed — no abuse of discretion; sentence upheld
Whether denial of I.C.R. 35 motion was erroneous Post: presented new/additional information (restitution uncertainty, family hardship, placement) justifying reduction State/District: information was not new or sufficient; court properly considered and rejected it Affirmed — denial proper; no abuse of discretion

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114 (1991) (standards for sentencing review)
  • State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447 (1984) (factors for reasonableness of sentence)
  • State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565 (1981) (sentencing discretion principles)
  • State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722 (2007) (review considers entire sentence)
  • State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318 (2006) (I.C.R. 35 as plea for leniency)
  • State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845 (1989) (I.C.R. 35 addressed to court's discretion)
  • State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201 (2007) (I.C.R. 35 requires new or additional information)
  • State v. Forde, 113 Idaho 21 (1986) (review of I.C.R. 35 uses same criteria as sentence reasonableness)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Cameron Everett Post
Court Name: Idaho Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 7, 2016
Court Abbreviation: Idaho Ct. App.