History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Button
195 Vt. 65
Vt.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Officer followed defendant on a remote, back-country road late at night after observing no traffic violations or distress.
  • Defendant pulled over to the right side with engine and lights on; the position posed no danger to traffic.
  • Trooper parked behind and waited about 30 seconds before activating blue lights to check on defendant.
  • Officer later arrest(object)ed defendant for DUI after speaking with him and observing additional indicators.
  • Defendant moved to suppress, arguing the stop was not justified by community caretaking; trial court denied suppression.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether stop justified by community caretaking doctrine State: caretaking justified by potential distress Button: no distress indication; not justified Not justified; reversed

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Burgess, 163 Vt. 259 (Vt. 1995) (limits of caretaking stops; need distress indicators)
  • State v. Marcello, 157 Vt. 657 (Vt. 1991) (caretaking requires specific, articulable facts of distress)
  • State v. Edwards, 183 Vt. 584 (Vt. 2008) (recognizes caretaking as permissible when distress evident)
  • State v. Jestice, 2004 VT 65 (Vt. 2004) (limited caretaking where no distress shown)
  • State v. Campbell, 173 Vt. 575 (Vt. 2001) (emergency/need for aid signals justify seizure)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Button
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Oct 4, 2013
Citation: 195 Vt. 65
Docket Number: 2012-270
Court Abbreviation: Vt.