State v. Butler
2012 Ohio 4152
Ohio Ct. App.2012Background
- Butler was convicted in the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court of second-degree burglary with a repeat violent offender specification under R.C. 2911.12(A)(2).
- The central issue on appeal was whether the evidence proved trespass in an occupied structure where someone was present or likely to be present.
- The apartment at issue was in a duplex; the lower unit housed the victim and the upper unit housed a witness; the victim had been hospitalized the night of the burglary.
- A witness upstairs observed noises from the victim’s apartment and identified Butler as the intruder when he exited the window used for entry.
- The victim’s cash and prescription pills were missing, and there was no testimony suggesting others had access to the apartment.
- The trial court ultimately held Butler not guilty of the charged offense as proven, but the court of appeals reversed and remanded to modify the conviction to a lesser offense.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the evidence shows trespass in an occupied structure | Butler; presence or likely presence established by occupancy in the duplex. | State; occupant presence or likelihood proven by hospital absence or presence and access. | Insufficient presence evidence under 2911.12(A)(2); vacate to seek lesser offense |
| Whether the evidence supports a lesser included offense of burglary under R.C. 2911.12(A)(3) | Butler; burglary under A(2) was proven. | State; any presence element not proven supports A(3). | Guilty under 2911.12(A)(3) permissible; remand to modify conviction |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Yarbrough, 95 Ohio St.3d 227 (2002-Ohio-2126) (sufficiency standard for appellate review)
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) (sufficiency of evidence standard)
- Cavazos v. Smith, 565 U.S. 1 (2011) (per curiam evidentiary standard guidance)
- State v. Kilby, 50 Ohio St.2d 21 (1977) (presence or likelihood of presence as element of burglary)
- State v. Hibbard, 2003-Ohio-707 (Ohio Ct. App.) (presence or likelihood of presence in burglary analysis)
- State v. Reed, 65 Ohio St.2d 117 (1981) (authority on modifying judgments where lesser offense proven)
- State v. Brown, 2006-Ohio-2307 (Ohio Ct. App.) (remand for modification when lesser offense shown)
- State v. Rothrock, 2010-Ohio-4102 (Ohio Ct. App.) (remand to modify judgment for correct offense)
- In re Meatchem, 2006-Ohio-4128 (Ohio Ct. App.) (lesser included offenses defined in burglary context)
- In re R.J.D., 2010-Ohio-1277 (Ohio Ct. App.) (application to burglary/occupancy considerations)
