History
  • No items yet
midpage
2014 Ohio 2669
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • In April 2013 Michelle Butler was indicted for one count of passing a bad check (felony 5th degree) after giving a $1,500 check to Joseph Kelly that was returned for insufficient funds.
  • Kelly owned rental property and had leased it to Laura Orcutt; Orcutt subleased to Butler for $400/month and collected Butler’s rent to forward to Kelly.
  • Orcutt stopped collecting Butler’s rent after January 2013; Kelly claimed Butler still owed $1,500 for February–April 2013.
  • Butler issued a $1,500 check to Kelly on April 12, 2013, which was dishonored when Kelly tried to deposit it.
  • Butler pled guilty; the trial court imposed community control and ordered $1,500 restitution to Kelly. Butler appealed the restitution order.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Kelly was a proper restitution victim and whether $1,500 restitution was an abuse of discretion Kelly (State) argued he was the victim because he was the payee of the bad check and suffered the $1,500 loss Butler argued she was not contractually obligated to pay Kelly rent and thus Kelly did not suffer compensable economic loss from the bad check Court held Kelly was the victim (object of the crime) and the $1,500 restitution reasonably related to his actual loss; no abuse of discretion

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Williams, 34 Ohio App.3d 33 (Ohio Ct. App.) (restitution must reasonably relate to actual loss)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Butler
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 20, 2014
Citations: 2014 Ohio 2669; 2013-CA-110
Docket Number: 2013-CA-110
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In