History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Bullitt
2016 Ohio 4868
Ohio Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • In December 2013 a jury convicted Deaunte Bullitt of drug trafficking, drug possession, possessing criminal tools, and tampering with evidence; he received an 11‑year sentence.
  • This court affirmed on direct appeal in 2014 (challenge to jury instructions only).
  • After direct appeal, Bullitt filed three pro se motions in the trial court: (1) a motion to set aside his conviction/sentence (postconviction relief alleging ineffective assistance, Eighth Amendment, and perjury), (2) a motion to compel release of public records (police radio recording), and (3) a motion to compel/preserve evidence for fingerprinting/DNA testing.
  • The trial court denied all three motions in a single order. Bullitt appealed the denial and raised five assignments of error (some arguments raised for the first time on appeal).
  • The Court of Appeals affirmed, concluding each motion was properly denied on procedural/statutory grounds.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness of postconviction petition under R.C. 2953.21 Bullitt: his postconviction petition should be considered (claims of ineffective assistance, perjury, cruel and unusual punishment) State: petition filed after 365‑day deadline; no exception applies Petition was untimely (trial transcript filed Feb. 10, 2014; petition filed May 7, 2015); court lacked jurisdiction to entertain it
Use of R.C. 149.43 to obtain records after direct appeal Bullitt: radio recording is exculpatory and necessary to support his relief State: R.C. 149.43 cannot be used by a defendant who has exhausted direct appeals to obtain material for postconviction relief Motion denied; defendant may not use public‑records statute to gather evidence to support postconviction claims (per Sawyer)
Request to preserve/compel testing of biological evidence under R.C. 2933.82 Bullitt: evidence should be preserved and tested for fingerprints/DNA to show innocence State: statute applies only to specified violent felonies (homicide, rape/sexual assault), not Bullitt’s drug offenses Motion denied; R.C. 2933.82 inapplicable because defendant was not convicted of covered offenses

Key Cases Cited

  • State ex rel. Sawyer v. Cuyahoga Cty. Dept. of Children & Family Servs., 110 Ohio St.3d 343 (2006) (defendants who have exhausted direct appeals may not use Ohio's public‑records statute to obtain materials in support of postconviction relief)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bullitt
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 7, 2016
Citation: 2016 Ohio 4868
Docket Number: 103798
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.