midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
704 S.E.2d 344
S.C.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Bryant began a crime spree in October 2004, committing multiple offenses including two first-degree burglaries, ABIK, and three murders, culminating in a death sentence for the Tietjen murder.
  • While awaiting trial, Bryant threatened a corrections officer and injured another, illustrating ongoing violent conduct.
  • Bryant pleaded guilty to offenses in chronological order and received multiple concurrent and consecutive sentences, including a death sentence for Tietjen and life sentences for other murders.
  • Mitigation evidence included childhood trauma, PTSD with a history of sexual abuse, ADD, chronic depression, and substance abuse.
  • Appellant sought to introduce Aunt Terry’s testimony that she had been sexually abused by Bryant’s grandfather; the trial court sustained the objection.
  • The issue presented is whether the trial court erred in excluding Aunt Terry’s testimony, given its relevance to mitigation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Testimony admissibility about abuse by grandfather Bryant State No reversible error; not prejudicial

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Winkler, 388 S.C. 574 (2010) (no abuse of discretion; admissibility matters resolved in mitigation context)
  • State v. Mercer, 381 S.C. 149 (2009) (excluded evidence presented through other witnesses not reversible error)
  • State v. Wyatt, 317 S.C. 370 (1995) (lack of prejudice supports affirmance when evidence excluded)
  • State v. Shuler, 344 S.C. 604 (2001) (capital sentence review standards for proportionality)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bryant
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Jan 7, 2011
Citations: 704 S.E.2d 344; 2011 S.C. LEXIS 1; 390 S.C. 638; 26906
Docket Number: 26906
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
Log In