History
  • No items yet
midpage
230 N.C. App. 324
N.C. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant arrested for DWI and driving with license revoked; vehicle impounded; multiple continuances over ~14 months and several speedy-trial demands by defendant.
  • District court issued a preliminary indication to dismiss for speedy-trial violation; State appealed to superior court under N.C.G.S. § 15A-1432(a)(1).
  • Superior court remanded for additional findings; district court made further findings and indicated intent to dismiss; State again appealed to superior court.
  • Superior court affirmed the district court’s preliminary ruling and remanded with instructions for the district court to enter a final dismissal; the district court entered final dismissal on July 20, 2012.
  • State appealed from the superior court’s affirmance to this Court but did not include the certificate required by N.C.G.S. § 15A-1432(e); the State later filed a belated certificate with its brief and sought certiorari.
  • The Court held the State’s appeal was governed by N.C.G.S. § 15A-1432(e), required a timely certificate from the district attorney, and dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the certificate was not timely filed.

Issues

Issue State's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Which statute governs State's appeal to this Court after superior court affirmed a district court dismissal? Appeal lies under N.C.G.S. § 15A-1445(a)(1) (appeal from superior court judgment). Appeal governed by N.C.G.S. § 15A-1432(e) because underlying final judgment originated in district court. N.C.G.S. § 15A-1432(e) controls when the State appeals a superior court order that affirms a district-court dismissal.
Does § 15A-1432(e)’s certificate requirement apply only to interlocutory orders? Certificate requirement applies only to interlocutory orders, so not applicable here. Certificate applies to appeals from final district-court orders affirmed by superior court. Certificate requirement applies to final orders affirming district-court judgments; not limited to interlocutory orders.
Can the State cure failure to timely file the certificate by filing it belatedly or via certiorari? A belated certificate or filing via certiorari cures the defect. Failure to timely file the certificate deprives appellate court of jurisdiction; belated filing insufficient. Belated filing or certiorari cannot cure failure to timely file the statutory certificate; appeal dismissed.
Is the appellate court without jurisdiction where the State fails to meet § 15A-1432(e)'s requirements? The court retains jurisdiction or should allow cure. No jurisdiction if statutory prerequisites are not met. Court lacks jurisdiction; appeal dismissed when State fails to satisfy statute.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Dobson, 51 N.C. App. 445, 276 S.E.2d 480 (1981) (State cannot appeal for defendant absent clear statutory authority)
  • State v. Davis, 364 N.C. 297, 698 S.E.2d 65 (2010) (statutory interpretation governed by legislative intent)
  • State v. Palmer, 197 N.C. App. 201, 676 S.E.2d 559 (2009) (§ 15A-1432 contemplates district court entering final judgment after remand)
  • State v. Fowler, 197 N.C. App. 1, 676 S.E.2d 523 (2009) (§ 15A-1432(a)(1) gives State right to appeal district-court dismissal; § 15A-1432(e) governs further appeal)
  • State v. Blandin, 60 N.C. App. 271, 298 S.E.2d 759 (1983) (belated filing of the required certificate cannot cure failure to timely comply)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bryan
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 5, 2013
Citations: 230 N.C. App. 324; 749 S.E.2d 900; 2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 1151; 2013 WL 5913804; No. COA13-520
Docket Number: No. COA13-520
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Bryan, 230 N.C. App. 324