State v. Brunning
2013 Ohio 365
Ohio Ct. App.2013Background
- Appellant Lindell W. Brunning, Jr. appealed after remand from the Ohio Supreme Court concerning the court of appeals’ prior judgment in State v. Brunning.
- Brunning was charged in Cuyahoga C.P. Nos. CR-532822 and CR-532770, with three offenses under the Adam Walsh Act (AWA) and pre-AWA provisions affecting penalties.
- The plea involved three counts: (1) verified address (R.C. 2950.06), (2) change of address notice (R.C. 2905.05(E)(1)), and (3) tampering with records (R.C. 2913.42); Counts 1 and 2 faced AWA-related issues.
- At the plea hearing, the State stated all three counts would merge for sentencing; the court advised that the maximum penalty would be 2–8 years.
- At sentencing, the court imposed a 21-year aggregate term on CR-532770, while Brunning later moved to withdraw his pleas, alleging promises or misrepresentations at or before plea.
- The Ohio Supreme Court partially reversed the prior judgment and remanded for consideration of issues previously deemed moot, including the first assignment of error and the sentence in CR-532770.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Brunning’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered. | Brunning asserts promises/misrepresentations induced the plea. | State provided no binding promises to merge or sentence. | Plea not knowing/voluntary; vacated. |
| Whether the trial court properly merged counts for sentencing. | Counts should be merged for sentencing as allied offenses. | State disputes merger; no agreement to merge. | Assignment sustained; Count 1 vacated; remand for Counts 2–3. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Brunning, 2012-Ohio-5752 (Ohio Supreme Court (2012)) (remand after partial reversal clarifies AWA-related issues)
- State v. Brunning, 2011-Ohio-1936 (Ohio 8th Dist. (2011)) (prior appellate decision on related issues)
- State v. Howard, 2012-Ohio-5738 (Ohio Supreme Court (2012)) (pre-AWA penalty for Megan’s Law offenses)
