History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Brown
143 Ohio St. 3d 444
| Ohio | 2015
Read the full case

Background

  • On March 16, 2011, a Lake Township police officer, Kelly Clark, observed a Chevy Impala briefly cross the fog line on I‑280 and stopped the car about 2.5 miles later.
  • Clark was a township officer who lacked statutory authority under R.C. 4513.39 to stop motorists for marked‑lane violations on interstate highways; she nonetheless conducted the stop and used a drug dog, yielding oxycodone and marijuana.
  • Brown was charged with aggravated possession; the trial court denied his suppression motion and he pleaded no contest and was sentenced to three years.
  • The Sixth District reversed, holding the extraterritorial stop violated Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution and ordering suppression of the evidence; the state appealed.
  • The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed: because the township officer acted without statutory authority to stop for a minor misdemeanor on an interstate, the stop, arrest, and search violated Article I, Section 14 and the evidence should have been suppressed.

Issues

Issue Brown's Argument State's Argument Held
Whether a traffic stop made without statutory jurisdiction violates Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution The stop violated Ohio Constitution; state statute denies township officers authority to enforce marked‑lane violations on interstates, so evidence must be suppressed Ohio and federal search‑and‑seizure protections are coextensive; probable cause renders an extraterritorial stop reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, so Article I, §14 should not be broader A stop for a minor misdemeanor made outside an officer’s statutory jurisdiction violates Article I, §14; suppression required
Whether a statutory violation (R.C. 4513.39) alone can trigger exclusion under Article I, §14 Statutory limit on officer power renders the stop unconstitutional — exclusionary rule applies A statute’s violation alone does not necessarily create a constitutional violation; federal precedent (Atwater/Moore) supports upholding stops based on probable cause Court held statutory violation here did rise to a constitutional violation under Article I, §14 because officer lacked authority; exclusionary remedy ordered

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Brown, 99 Ohio St.3d 323 (2003) (Ohio Constitution provides greater protection than Fourth Amendment against warrantless arrests for minor misdemeanors)
  • State v. Jones, 88 Ohio St.3d 430 (2000) (balancing test for reasonableness under Ohio Constitution)
  • State v. Jones, 121 Ohio St.3d 103 (2009) (probable cause suffices for extraterritorial traffic stop under Fourth Amendment)
  • State v. Holbert, 38 Ohio St.2d 113 (1974) (statute precluding township enforcement of enumerated traffic laws bars stops/arrests)
  • Atwater v. Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318 (2001) (Fourth Amendment permits arrest for minor misdemeanor if officer has probable cause)
  • Virginia v. Moore, 553 U.S. 164 (2008) (probable cause conclusively establishes constitutional reasonableness of arrest)
  • State v. Robinette, 80 Ohio St.3d 234 (1997) (Ohio and federal protections treated as coextensive in search‑and‑seizure analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Brown
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 23, 2015
Citation: 143 Ohio St. 3d 444
Docket Number: No. 2014-0104
Court Abbreviation: Ohio